Re: Oh boy NIKE in trouble
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:28 am
Professional sports is where the teams (schools in this instance) pay the players a salary.
That's not what is being suggested.
That's not what is being suggested.
But only one answer/solution results in the NCAA and its member institutions continuing to get fat rich and happy. That's the solution they've always gone with and why things have not changed.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:25 amI assume that IF they knew how to fix it in a satisfactory manner that will satisfy most, if not satisfy all, they will/would do so. They have not done so as of yet. So I take that mean they don't know how, yet. Maybe they will know how down the road. Maybe.jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:13 amBut: yes, we do.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:12 am Most realize that the head coaches, asst coaches, kids, parents, guardians, handlers, aau coaches, shoe companies, agents, posses, hangersoners are participating in nonsense on the recruiting trail. We just don't know what, if anything, can be done about it.
You put 5 so-called experts around a table and ask them what to do, we get 4 different answers.
What we know is that changes could be made that result in different things happening such as shoe contracts and agents to college players and elite are recruits to the NBA. What we dont know is whether or not those changes would eliminate the rule breaking or just move the sport to new models of rule breaking.jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:13 amBut: yes, we do.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:12 am Most realize that the head coaches, asst coaches, kids, parents, guardians, handlers, aau coaches, shoe companies, agents, posses, hangersoners are participating in nonsense on the recruiting trail. We just don't know what, if anything, can be done about it.
Has the NCAA actually had to answer for any of this? They have done virtually nothing about the problems exposed by the FBI.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:28 amBut only one answer/solution results in the NCAA and its member institutions continuing to get fat rich and happy. That's the solution they've always gone with and why things have not changed.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:25 amI assume that IF they knew how to fix it in a satisfactory manner that will satisfy most, if not satisfy all, they will/would do so. They have not done so as of yet. So I take that mean they don't know how, yet. Maybe they will know how down the road. Maybe.
You put 5 so-called experts around a table and ask them what to do, we get 4 different answers.
It took millions of taxpayer dollars for the NCAA to finally have to answer for the absolute nonsensical feel goodiness that is amateurism.
Be careful what you wish for. We'd be better served if they drag their feet for a few years so that more schools (coaches) can get caught up....because as it sits right now it appears if they're going to make a statement related to the FBI trials it's likely going to be at the expense of Kansas/UL/Zona....twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 1:01 pmHas the NCAA actually had to answer for any of this? They have done virtually nothing about the problems exposed by the FBI.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:28 amBut only one answer/solution results in the NCAA and its member institutions continuing to get fat rich and happy. That's the solution they've always gone with and why things have not changed.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:25 am
I assume that IF they knew how to fix it in a satisfactory manner that will satisfy most, if not satisfy all, they will/would do so. They have not done so as of yet. So I take that mean they don't know how, yet. Maybe they will know how down the road. Maybe.
You put 5 so-called experts around a table and ask them what to do, we get 4 different answers.
It took millions of taxpayer dollars for the NCAA to finally have to answer for the absolute nonsensical feel goodiness that is amateurism.
Again: you would have trouble finding a neutral expert on markets and human psychology who thinks that throwing sunshine (and rules and disclosure and reporting) onto a black market is likely to make things worse.twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 1:00 pmWhat we know is that changes could be made that result in different things happening such as shoe contracts and agents to college players and elite are recruits to the NBA. What we dont know is whether or not those changes would eliminate the rule breaking or just move the sport to new models of rule breaking.jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:13 amBut: yes, we do.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:12 am Most realize that the head coaches, asst coaches, kids, parents, guardians, handlers, aau coaches, shoe companies, agents, posses, hangersoners are participating in nonsense on the recruiting trail. We just don't know what, if anything, can be done about it.
In true NCAA fashion: The Rice Commission.twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 1:01 pmHas the NCAA actually had to answer for any of this? They have done virtually nothing about the problems exposed by the FBI.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:28 amBut only one answer/solution results in the NCAA and its member institutions continuing to get fat rich and happy. That's the solution they've always gone with and why things have not changed.MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:25 am
I assume that IF they knew how to fix it in a satisfactory manner that will satisfy most, if not satisfy all, they will/would do so. They have not done so as of yet. So I take that mean they don't know how, yet. Maybe they will know how down the road. Maybe.
You put 5 so-called experts around a table and ask them what to do, we get 4 different answers.
It took millions of taxpayer dollars for the NCAA to finally have to answer for the absolute nonsensical feel goodiness that is amateurism.
The source in this case is not exactly reliable.
Please stop spreading your dumb.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:12 pm They don't need to clear a guy who will never play another game in the NCAA.
Sure, but in the case of drug cartels, it could be easily argued that it’s making hem shift to products whose effects are much worse.jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 1:09 pmAgain: you would have trouble finding a neutral expert on markets and human psychology who thinks that throwing sunshine (and rules and disclosure and reporting) onto a black market is likely to make things worse.twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 1:00 pmWhat we know is that changes could be made that result in different things happening such as shoe contracts and agents to college players and elite are recruits to the NBA. What we dont know is whether or not those changes would eliminate the rule breaking or just move the sport to new models of rule breaking.