Re: Trump derangement syndrome
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2024 1:32 pm
Incorrect. That’s no more a diagnosis than calling someone “fucktard,” as certain parties around here are wont to do.
Yes instead of trump let's vote for the pro war party. Under Biden/harris foreign conflicts have broken out in multiple places, and the US military industrial machine has been right there with taxpayer dollars and profits for Blackrock and shareholders. We are really close to world War 3 already, but if you vote kamala, with another 4 years we can get there. All it will take is a little bit more corrupt war mongering and provoking in ukraineRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:26 am I'll see randy's "Greatest political ad of all time" "Independence" video, and raise him this video...
https://twitter.com/votevets/status/1829293509561487819
As you point out, it is highly subjective, even in the best of circumstances. Case in point: In the 1970’s a Stanford professor had a group of students fake mental illness to get admitted to a psych hospital. Not only were they admitted, but they had a hell of a time convincing the medical staff that they were pretending so they could be released.
Saying the Dems are "pro-war" is almost as ignorant as saying the Dems are "pro-abortion".randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 1:37 pmYes instead of trump let's vote for the pro war party. Under Biden/harris foreign conflicts have broken out in multiple places, and the US military industrial machine has been right there with taxpayer dollars and profits for Blackrock and shareholders. We are really close to world War 3 already, but if you vote kamala, with another 4 years we can get there. All it will take is a little bit more corrupt war mongering and provoking in ukraineRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:26 am I'll see randy's "Greatest political ad of all time" "Independence" video, and raise him this video...
https://twitter.com/votevets/status/1829293509561487819
You’re pretty darned predictable. That much is certain.
Ahhh. The great Rosenhan dilemma and what I have thought about in deeper terms, because I myself was "mis-evaluated" and "institutionalized" for a few hours, before I got an attorney involved and got the heck out. I have shared that story and can/will share it again but I'll spare you and everyone else for now.JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:16 pmAs you point out, it is highly subjective, even in the best of circumstances. Case in point: In the 1970’s a Stanford professor had a group of students fake mental illness to get admitted to a psych hospital. Not only were they admitted, but they had a hell of a time convincing the medical staff that they were pretending so they could be released.
I’ve said nothing that is objectively bigoted or misogynistic. If that’s your perception, at least own it, rather than demanding that everyone else see it as objective.KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:51 pmcool story
tell us again how you’re a changed man, while simultaneously posting the same bigoted and misogynistic bullshit
yeah, i’m the predictable one
Meh, like I said. I am not concerned with the opinion of people who have proven to be insincere liars who seem to revel in spewing obvious bullshit. If I do not seem normal to you then that's a badge of honor for me and I will take it as a compliment. Thank you and enjoy your holiday weekend!JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 12:05 pmYour assumption that you are "normal," or even mainstream, is probably the root of the issue here.
Breaking news, a hospital will take anyone's money.JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:16 pmAs you point out, it is highly subjective, even in the best of circumstances. Case in point: In the 1970’s a Stanford professor had a group of students fake mental illness to get admitted to a psych hospital. Not only were they admitted, but they had a hell of a time convincing the medical staff that they were pretending so they could be released.
You mean Trump's buddy invading Ukraine you POS? Get lost. What a POSrandylahey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 3:03 pm Under trump we were not funneling hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars into foreign conflicts. Under the biden/harris regime we are. Ukraine and Russia were ready to come to peace terms into NATO stepped back in. this continued war guarantees 2 things: people dying and profits for the military industrial machine
It’s tricky, but the central question is not whether or. It someone is psychotic, but whether they are a danger to themselves or others. Thinking you’re Jesus or the King of England isn’t illegal; believing that your identity as one of those individuals gives you the right to kill people is.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:55 pmAhhh. The great Rosenhan dilemma and what I have thought about in deeper terms, because I myself was "mis-evaluated" and "institutionalized" for a few hours, before I got an attorney involved and got the heck out. I have shared that story and can/will share it again but I'll spare you and everyone else for now.JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:16 pmAs you point out, it is highly subjective, even in the best of circumstances. Case in point: In the 1970’s a Stanford professor had a group of students fake mental illness to get admitted to a psych hospital. Not only were they admitted, but they had a hell of a time convincing the medical staff that they were pretending so they could be released.
I would sincerely/genuinely appreciate your insight - and I promise I will not ridicule you for it.
Basically in regards to the Rosenhan "experiment".... Someone tells you he/she is hallucinating and hearing voices when you are evaluating them. Then soon after, they act "fine" and tell you they are "fine". So... What as a care giver are you supposed to do? Let them go out in to society without making sure they are "fine"? What if any liability do you have? My guess is there are "waivers" that are signed. Yes? No?
It's also just a guess that many if not a majority of people who are "institutionalized" against their will, will tell their caregivers (and/or try to pretend) that they are "fine" to get the heck out of the "institution".
On the flip side, someone tells you they are "fine" when you are evaluating them, and they are really hallucinating and hearing voices and don't tell you as such. How would you know that they are actually hallucinating and hearing voices if you didn't spend an excessive amount of time evaluating them?
Donald Trump agreed to force the Afghan government to release 5,000 Taliban prisoners and one of them ended up killing 13 American soldiers, including the one whose grave he stood on a few days while giving a thumbs up sign while filming a Tik Tok video.randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 1:37 pmYes instead of trump let's vote for the pro war party. Under Biden/harris foreign conflicts have broken out in multiple places, and the US military industrial machine has been right there with taxpayer dollars and profits for Blackrock and shareholders. We are really close to world War 3 already, but if you vote kamala, with another 4 years we can get there. All it will take is a little bit more corrupt war mongering and provoking in ukraineRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:26 am I'll see randy's "Greatest political ad of all time" "Independence" video, and raise him this video...
https://twitter.com/votevets/status/1829293509561487819
Likewise. Sounds like we agree on that at least.