DeletedUser wrote: ↑Mon Nov 27, 2023 4:35 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Nov 27, 2023 4:07 pm
DeletedUser wrote: ↑Mon Nov 27, 2023 3:21 pm
I think our prison guards should focus on protecting the inmates who actually deserve protecting first and foremost since protecting everyone at every moment is not realistic.
Anyway, fantasy land is fun. But prison justice always has and always will exist. Especially for rapists/child molestors and white cops who publicly kill black people. No way to reduce it to 0. Our prisons are relatively safe. Only 143 murders in United States prisons in 2022.
Yeah, I'll take a hard pass on letting those employed as prison guards have any say in who does and does not deserve to be protected.
All we're saying is that we need to constantly evaluate and improve our systems with the intention to try to keep all inmates safe and to not look at some of them as not worthy of that consideration. All humans deserve that if they are incarcerated.
I get what you're (and they're) saying, I have already agreed with a lot of it. It's not complicated.
I personally don't feel all humans who are incarcerated deserve to be safe from harm. I think "SOME" inmates, NOT "all" or "most" or even "many", deserve to endure the prison justice they inevitably receive. No need to go round and round about it. You came a few hours too late for that probably. The other posters already covered everything you have said since they feel the same as you, you're just repeating them at this point. I am comfortable with a certain amount of "prison justice", just as I am comfortable with a certain amount of "street justice". We all have a different appetite for violence and it's place in society.
Omar says a mans got to have a code. I agree with Omar.
But I do think it's funny out one side of your mouth you make a degrading comment about prison guards and the other side of your mouth you're expecting them to do the impossible task of reduce violent crime inside prisons to 0.
I still think you're coming at this from too narrow and specific of an angle. It's easy to pick and choose offenders who "deserve" what's coming to them in prison.
I've said my piece about innocent people ending up shivved. I stand by those points.
I'll also add that a system that turns a blind eye to vigilante justice puts others at risk in other ways.
What about a non-violent inmate who is forced by the vigilantes to open a door or get a weapon or watch for guards? That guy either commits a crime (and jeopardizes his "good time"), or gets on the vigilante's bad side.
What about an ill or injured inmate, whose access to EXTREMELY limited resources is bumped down the list because a guy got shivved?
What about the staff, who might get caught up in the fight themselves?
What about uninvolved inmates, who lose privileges because their cellmate takes it upon himself to do what the judge did not?
And so on.
I'm not naive. Vigilante justice will happen inside prisons, just like it will happen outside of them. But just because we are dealing with convicted criminals - people we like to not think much about, thank you very much - does not mean we should be any more tolerant of vigilante justice within prisons as without.