Page 32 of 76

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:10 am
by Deleted User 863
ousdahl wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:54 am Why, exactly, is it not a non-partisan issue?
Why is it not? Or why should it not be?

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:51 am
by ousdahl
I’m genuinely asking.

I dunno why more Mericans don’t care about this, don’t shout this shit down as rotten, yet here we are.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:58 am
by Deleted User 89
google “leading lobbying industries US 2020”

same reason we don’t have reasonable and meaningful gun legislation

edit: and keep in mind that lobbyists do more than just getting politicians to vote a certain way...they are also often engaged in the public messaging that accompanies certain stances

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 12:01 pm
by ousdahl
I’d also guess any campaign with such a pro-consumer anti-bidness platform would be labeled as too radical in all hit a few districts.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 12:09 pm
by Deleted User 89
and unfortunately, i’d guess that pharma is often lumped into “medical” in general, and so there is an inherent level of trust among many that they’re gonna is what’s best/right for the patient

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 12:23 pm
by ousdahl
…unless they’re trying to provide vaccines during a pandemic.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 12:25 pm
by Deleted User 89
ousdahl wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 12:23 pm …unless they’re trying to provide vaccines during a pandemic.
those idiots are just a highly vocal minority

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:45 pm
by zsn
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:18 am given the behavior of purdue pharma and the sacklers (among a multitude of others), i think it would behoove congress to keep a closer eye on the goings on at pharma firms (and this comes from someone that works at one)
I second that, also as someone that works in the pharmaceutical industry.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:26 am
by ousdahl

Re: Strikes

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:33 am
by Deleted User 89
i thought capitalism without competition was a monopoly

Re: Strikes

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:37 am
by ousdahl
I mean, most “capitalists” would rather operate in a monopolistic market, wouldn’t they?

For instance, isn’t Facebook in hot water for buying up competition instead of competing with it?

Re: Strikes

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:57 am
by Deleted User 863
ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:37 am I mean, most “capitalists” would rather operate in a monopolistic market, wouldn’t they?

For instance, isn’t Facebook in hot water for buying up competition instead of competing with it?
There just aren't that many companies capable of monopolizing their industry. But FB and Amazon certainly have done that (or come very close), and i am sure they love it.

Most companies aren't capable of getting to that size/capacity.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 11:17 am
by Deleted User 89
both of those company’s came along at the right time too

myspace could have competed with facebook had they done things differently. though, i think facebook had an ace in the hole by starting out solely as a platform for college kids

Re: Strikes

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 11:29 am
by ousdahl
Yeah, Facebook had a certain exclusive appeal.

I wonder what the factors were that gave it critical mass, and the competitive advantage over MySpace and shit. Maybe the fact that user profiles didn’t automatically start playing Blink 182 songs upon viewing?

It was so much cooler when it was just about trying to slide into the DMs of that chick from English class who you’re also pretty sure lives in Templin Hall too

Re: Strikes

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:00 am
by ousdahl

Re: Strikes

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:12 am
by ousdahl
Don’t want the totally random thread to be too on point

Image

Re: Strikes

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:46 am
by ousdahl
moving right along…

and just to be clear, I’m not fond of bumping this thread either.

https://www.businessinsider.com/kroger- ... ack-2021-7

Kroger closed grocery stores rather than give workers a $4 raise. Now it's padding shareholders' pockets with a $1 billion stock-buyback scheme.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:27 pm
by Mjl
ousdahl wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:46 am moving right along…

and just to be clear, I’m not fond of bumping this thread either.

https://www.businessinsider.com/kroger- ... ack-2021-7

Kroger closed grocery stores rather than give workers a $4 raise. Now it's padding shareholders' pockets with a $1 billion stock-buyback scheme.
Why would you keep a grocery store open if it's going to lose money?

Kroger gave all store employees bonuses and hourly raises last year because of Covid, more than once. They give a shitload to charity through their zero-hunget-zero-waste initiative. They gave every employee (500,000 of them) $100 for getting vaccinated, along with raffles for $5 million or a year of free groceries.

And stock buybacks aren't a "scheme".

Re: Strikes

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 3:29 pm
by Deleted User 863
Mjl wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:27 pm
ousdahl wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:46 am moving right along…

and just to be clear, I’m not fond of bumping this thread either.

https://www.businessinsider.com/kroger- ... ack-2021-7

Kroger closed grocery stores rather than give workers a $4 raise. Now it's padding shareholders' pockets with a $1 billion stock-buyback scheme.
Why would you keep a grocery store open if it's going to lose money?

Kroger gave all store employees bonuses and hourly raises last year because of Covid, more than once. They give a shitload to charity through their zero-hunget-zero-waste initiative. They gave every employee (500,000 of them) $100 for getting vaccinated, along with raffles for $5 million or a year of free groceries.

And stock buybacks aren't a "scheme".
Minor details.

Re: Strikes

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 3:34 pm
by Deleted User 863
If kroger interests you it is currently less than $41 per share. Get in on the scheme. 2% dividend too.