randylahey wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 1:34 am
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:21 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:57 pm
And the nomination for dumbest post of the week goes to...
Considering you "literally" made this post.....
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Report Quote
Post by randylahey » Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm
The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do
And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria
......I'm confident you will receive consideration for the award too.
You earned my vote.
Congrats!
How quickly you forget... that happened. Biden narrowed his finalists for vp down to a small group of minority women. If you were not a minority and a woman, you were not eligible to be his potential vp. Because it didn't fit the narrative they were trying to sell
So in other words, you are backtracking and admitting what you said ("The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be BLACK woman").
is 100% false?
You also said, "They literally said that".
That's 100% false too. Right?
Heck, You had repeated yourself by saying, "And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for".
WRONG.
Now you are saying, "If you were not a minority and a woman, you were not eligible to be his potential vp".
That's different than your original claim. Right? Guess what? You are still WRONG.
--------
How quickly I forget "that happened"? NO, I have NOT forgotten "THAT" did NOT happen.
I remember who many of the people were that were being seriously considered.
Why do I remember? Because I was personally involved in helping to coordinate some of the meetings with the potential "candidates" that were meeting with some of the people who were doing the vetting.
I remember personally welcoming those people to the meetings.
HELLO!
I typically have a not such a good memory but this is something I recall vividly.
Although, I will grant you that after going through the extensive process of choosing the VP, the last few "candidates" being considered were indeed primarily minority women - but NOT all of them were "BLACK - as YOU claimed - and not all were minority.
I fully admit I do NOT know who were the strongest "candidates" of the remaining few that were being considered and it very well may have come down to two or three of the final candidates being Black.
At NO point during at least the beginning, middle, and towards the end of the process, did "THEY" EVER "literally" say "MUST be black woman" and an NO point during at least the beginning, middle, and towards the end of the process, did "THEY" EVER "literally" say that was what "THEY" were looking for.
I challenge you to prove me wrong and more importantly, prove yourself right.