Kansas Crimson

TDub wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 7:46 am you've been unbearable on every board.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 7:29 am to me, "full illy" is being annoying as fuck on every single bored.

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 8:16 am you guys don’t like attention whores?

DeletedUser wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 8:19 am Isn't Ousdahl something like 30-40 years old? Has he considered acting like an adult more often? The goofy/stupid/wannabe class clown thing has gotten old. Especially when the other half of the time he is masquerading around as an enlightened foreign relations expert.

Also Q, it's not everyone else's job to ignore you. I also tried that in the past. It is not how this game works. Almost everyone here is sick of you (at least right now) and doesn't enjoy you being here. You seem to refuse to accept that.

So now, everyday, you ruin most threads you touch, and think it's everyone else's fault, even though shockingly, almost everyone else gets along pretty well right now.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 8:23 am this is some artisanal level QT smack talk.

Shirley wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 10:29 am For the record, I met ousdahl ~ a year ago and although we didn't spend that much time together, he seemed like a great guy, and was easy to be around.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 11:32 am I think there are probably ( i don't read the poli-bored very often ) things he's said that actually have merit and are true and the general group in the poli-bored have probably 'gaslit' him etc. but there have been things i've read where he pulls a randy on the other end of the spectrum ( left vs right or whatever ) but a similar strategy - presenting an idea as fact/inferred as true with no evidence or a level of evidence of, say, me creating a blog here.

TDub wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 1:50 pmabuse...lol

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 1:43 pm Despite the intent of this thread - thanks to those who have offered kind words.

Im going to refrain from trying to discuss every single point brought up that’s worth discussing, cuz I know all too well it’s NOT worth discussing.

All I’d like to say for now is - by the very nature of the abuse, I think that more benefit of the doubt should be given to the gaslit, more so than the gaslighter.

So if someone says they feel gaslit, the more appropriate response is to pause, try to conjure a little humility, and at least be open to the idea that it’s happening; rather than to double down like, “I would strongly disagree!”