Something tells me you don't know many CEOs either. Do you - and am I mistaken?BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:32 am Something tells me you don't know many CEOs.
And for as much time as you spend on here, all day, every day, you can't possibly be working ANY harder than those you lump together and chastise.
I know many CEOs.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:37 amSomething tells me you don't know many CEOs either. Do you - and am I mistaken?BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:32 am Something tells me you don't know many CEOs.
And for as much time as you spend on here, all day, every day, you can't possibly be working ANY harder than those you lump together and chastise.
Fully admit I wasn't originally on the same page as you and mistook your tone.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:53 amI know many CEOs.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:37 amSomething tells me you don't know many CEOs either. Do you - and am I mistaken?BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:32 am Something tells me you don't know many CEOs.
And for as much time as you spend on here, all day, every day, you can't possibly be working ANY harder than those you lump together and chastise.
Most work much harder than I do. The CEOs of the 2 companies I work for certainly do. I am guessing neither have 6 hours a day to dedicate to posting fabricated/exaggerated stories on messageboards.
Q lumps the 10-20 CEOs from large companies that he dislikes and thinks provide "nothing of value" in with all the other CEOs who maybe have companies with 20 or 50 or 100 employees (or whatever).
The majority of CEOs aren't like Elon Musk. The majority of CEOs aren't golden spoon kids who were given companies by their parents.
If only all these companies knew how much value Qusdahl would provide they wouldn't need those CEOs. He's so much smarter than all these people he can't get ahead of in life. It's the system holding him down/back.
Poor guy. Just can't catch a break. Well, other than being born as a white male in the United States of America.
Right, as far as when you are born - but after that, SOME people change their skin color, gender, nationality, and parents.
Here is some data. If you actually care. Which I doubt you do.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:29 am illy, even if I COULD read your posts cuz others quote you despite being on ignore, I still can't understand a thing you say, cuz your mouth is so full of CEO genitals.
re: white males, that's quite a can of worms! But in the context of this thread and particular discussion, I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess there aren't many CEOs who AREN'T white males, are there?
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:01 amHere is some data. If you actually care. Which I doubt you do.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:29 am illy, even if I COULD read your posts cuz others quote you despite being on ignore, I still can't understand a thing you say, cuz your mouth is so full of CEO genitals.
re: white males, that's quite a can of worms! But in the context of this thread and particular discussion, I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess there aren't many CEOs who AREN'T white males, are there?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/109 ... ed-states/
So, there are "many" CEOs who aren't white males. And the number is growing each year.
arent you the one always throwing fits about ad hominem? Mirrorousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:09 am illy, if you really want to engage me, you're still gonna have to do something to get yerself unignored.
And besides, even if you weren't on ignore, I can't understand you when your words on this matter are not words, so much as they are more just a series of rhythmic slurps and gargles.
You called a black person an Uncle Tom. If you don't think that is problematic, then that's on you.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:33 pm how is that ad hominem?
either way, remember what fuss you raised after that one time I called you a nazi?
just ask yourself: how much of that shit would you be willing to put up with? For how long? If I was repeatedly accusing you of calling you a nazi.
Illy did as much to me, by repeatedly accusing me of being racist even though I repeatedly denied and condemned it, and by repeatedly accusing me of using the N word despite repeatedly failing to produce any examples of me doing so when requested.
How much of that shit should I be willing to put up with?
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:41 pmYou called a black person an Uncle Tom. If you don't think that is problematic, then that's on you.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:33 pm how is that ad hominem?
either way, remember what fuss you raised after that one time I called you a nazi?
just ask yourself: how much of that shit would you be willing to put up with? For how long? If I was repeatedly accusing you of calling you a nazi.
Illy did as much to me, by repeatedly accusing me of being racist even though I repeatedly denied and condemned it, and by repeatedly accusing me of using the N word despite repeatedly failing to produce any examples of me doing so when requested.
How much of that shit should I be willing to put up with?
I believe you referred to Clarence Thomas as Clarence Uncle Thomas. That's just cringey and unnecessary. It's not funny to me. Maybe others enjoy casually racist humor, but not me.
I've never intentionally played the victim card, even when the rest of the bored at large is otherwise going full-on radical militant in the war thread.TDub wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:37 pm how is that ad hominem? you ignored his point and provided sources and instead said he was slurping and gurgling.....its the exact definition of ad hominem.
but it doesn't matter because nuh uh...he started it!
I'm just saying, you can't pick and choose when to play the victim and then turn around and do the same shit.
oh..
and you have repeatedly called me various things....one of them specifically as the leader of nazis no less.