Kansas Crimson

Grandma wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:08 am I have a friend who asked people on Facebook their opinions on him traveling to Argentina and Brazil.
It was about 50/50 in terms of those who said he should go and those who said he shouldn't.

After reading the previous 71 responses this was my response....

Some people responding don't seem to realize it's so much more than worrying if YOU contract the virus. Parts of the world are going in shut down mode - with more to come. Think about what would happen if you were traveling in Northern Italy right now. You would be fu*ked. Heck, I am supposed to travel to California in 2 weeks. Probably not going to happen because I am under the impression it's going to get a whole lot worse to the point where everything I want to do (NCAA Basketball games, Dodgers game, attend Awards show, go to nice restaurants, etc.) will possibly/probably be postponed/cancelled. I have ZERO doubt that traveling in and out of airports will become a major issue to the point where some may actually become quarantined. It's going to really suck for anyone/everyone. Forgetting all that, I don't care how much money you have - the world's economy is getting CRUSHED. Inevitable major shut downs, layoffs, etc. across the board to come.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:45 am

Feral wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:35 am According to The Atlantic, the CDC isn't going to let us know the # of negative COVID-19 tests. My default is to trust the CDC, but I'd be curious to hear their reasoning.

Meanwhile, just this morning. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like he aught to have something better to do.

sdoyel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:48 am

Feral wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:35 am According to The Atlantic, the CDC isn't going to let us know the # of negative COVID-19 tests. My default is to trust the CDC, but I'd be curious to hear their reasoning.

Meanwhile, just this morning. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like he aught to have something better to do.

I’m so sick of this dumb fuck.

Feral wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:35 am According to The Atlantic, the CDC isn't going to let us know the # of negative COVID-19 tests. My default is to trust the CDC, but I'd be curious to hear their reasoning.

Meanwhile, just this morning. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like he aught to have something better to do.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:54 pm

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:28 pm i’ll preface this by saying that i don’t want anyone getting sick, let alone dying....

but, it would serve this administration right if this thing blew up in their faces (more than it already has)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!

I posted the bit last night about CPAC. The guy who runs CPAC introduced and shook hands with POTUS and VPOTUS after meeting with and have conversations with the guy who tested positive.

If one of them gets it, then whole mutherfucking arc of the response changes instantly.

I agree with you; I don't want anyone getting sick. But it would certainly motivate their fat asses.

Ever since the coronavirus exploded outside of China at the end of January, Donald Trump has treated the public health crisis as a media war that he could win with the right messaging. But with cases now documented in 34 states and markets plunging, Republicans close to Trump fear his rosy assessments are fundamentally detached from reality in ways that will make the epidemic worse. “He is trying to control the narrative and he can’t,” a former West Wing official told me.

The problem is that the crisis fits into his preexisting and deeply held worldview—that the media is always searching for a story to bring him down. Covid-19 is merely the latest instance, and he’s reacting in familiar ways. “So much FAKE NEWS!” Trump tweeted this morning. “He wants Justice to open investigations of the media for market manipulation,” a source close to the White House told me. Trump is also frustrated with his West Wing for not getting a handle on the news cycle.

[...]

[O]one person who spoke to the president over the weekend saw the press conference as an ominous sign. “He’s just now waking up to the fact that this is bad, and he doesn’t know how to respond.”

As Trump pushes a nothing-to-see-here message in public, sources said he’s privately terrified about getting the virus.

[...]

Stories about Trump’s coronavirus fears have spread through the White House. Last week Trump told aides he’s afraid journalists will try to purposefully contract coronavirus to give it to him on Air Force One, a person close to the administration told me. The source also said Trump has asked the Secret Service to set up a screening program and bar anyone who has a cough from the White House grounds. “He’s definitely melting down over this,” the source said.

But thus far Trump’s private concerns haven’t affected his public response. Pressure from the public health community is mounting on Trump to cancel his mass rallies, but Trump is pushing back. “He is going to resist until the very last minute,” a former West Wing official said. “He may take suggestions to stop shaking hands, but in terms of shutting stuff down, his position is: ‘No, I’m not going to do it.’”

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:54 pm

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:28 pm i’ll preface this by saying that i don’t want anyone getting sick, let alone dying....

but, it would serve this administration right if this thing blew up in their faces (more than it already has)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!

I posted the bit last night about CPAC. The guy who runs CPAC introduced and shook hands with POTUS and VPOTUS after meeting with and have conversations with the guy who tested positive.

If one of them gets it, then whole mutherfucking arc of the response changes instantly.

I agree with you; I don't want anyone getting sick. But it would certainly motivate their fat asses.