In this thread, the "experts" own Lobs

[Walrus]

I'll be happy to shut up as soon as this vaccine passport nonsense is thrown out. Sadly though, it sounds like much of our world wants it, which is insane, illegal, dangerous and just plain immoral.

[Cascadia]

I’ve been on the fence regarding the vaccine passport, but now I’m 100% in support of them.

Just so I can watch the Lobby meltdown.

[PhDhawk]

We're never going to see eye to eye, so all I ask is that the vax remain voluntary. I've known several people who got covid and did not even realize it because it was so mild. I've known of a few older people who did die from it, all of which had some health issue prior. I would rather take my chances with the virus rather than with big phrama. Just my .02. Hopefully in the next couple of years we find out that there are no serious long term effects from the vaccine -- I hope. I just have concerns about it possibly damaging the natural immune system, which comes from some experts. They could be wrong, but we shall see. I don't like taking risks with my body.

The likelihood of having longterm effects from a virus are MUCH MUCH higher than from a vaccine.

And there's TONS of evidence that this virus has long term effects.

There's no indication or precedent for this or any vaccine having long term effects.

[twocoach]

Pretty funny to see this. Back in June 2020, CNBC had this video that wasn't supposed to go live.
I can see why they took it down later, as they wanted people to keep their masks on and live in fear. Fortunately, you can watch it on another channel. They probably made this video because that was the time the protests/riots were happening and this is how they tried to justify it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/09/who-scr ... known.html

"“Some estimates of around 40% of transmission may be due to asymptomatic, but those are from models, so I didn’t include that in my answer yesterday, but wanted to make sure that I covered that here,” Kerkhove said. "

[Walrus]

Pretty funny to see this. Back in June 2020, CNBC had this video that wasn't supposed to go live.
I can see why they took it down later, as they wanted people to keep their masks on and live in fear. Fortunately, you can watch it on another channel. They probably made this video because that was the time the protests/riots were happening and this is how they tried to justify it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/09/who-scr ... known.html

"“Some estimates of around 40% of transmission may be due to asymptomatic, but those are from models, so I didn’t include that in my answer yesterday, but wanted to make sure that I covered that here,” Kerkhove said. "

That was of course after they realized putting out the truth did not serve the narrative.

[Walrus]

This doctor doesn't plan to take it because he mentions the fact that his natural covid antibodies would provide better protection than the vax.

[jhawks99]

I'm not a doctor, but I play one on youtube.

[Walrus]

Alright, Cascy.

[Deleted User 89]

“the fact that his natural covid antibodies would provide better protection than the vax.”

not a fact, but an assumption

you really are a pathological liar

[Deleted User 865]

I'm not a doctor, but I play one on youtube.

I, as a doctor, too wear my scrubs in the car and keep a stethoscope on while driving because who knows when I'm going to need it.

[jhawks99]

I dig the turtle neck

[Walrus]

lol, just another sample of the woke idiots. Let's not hire the best person, let's hire the person who is not a white male.

[defixione]

Where in the article does it say they will opt for gender selection over experience and talent?

[Deleted User 89]

it doesn’t

lobs is just insecure

[Overlander]

Is this one of those jobs that Lobster isn't qualified for, yet he gets all pissy if he finds out that the companies might hire some non whites and/or women for?

[Walrus]

All I can say is, if I'm having surgery, I want the best surgeon, period. I could care less what color skin they are, or if they are a woman or man. We should be hiring the best people for the job, and that is why America is falling behind China.

[Deleted User 89]

i thought being like china was bad?

[Walrus]

Absolutely terrifying and wrong. They aren't even hiding their sick agenda.





https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/covid-v ... -shot.html

[twocoach]

Pretty funny to see this. Back in June 2020, CNBC had this video that wasn't supposed to go live.
I can see why they took it down later, as they wanted people to keep their masks on and live in fear. Fortunately, you can watch it on another channel. They probably made this video because that was the time the protests/riots were happening and this is how they tried to justify it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/09/who-scr ... known.html

"“Some estimates of around 40% of transmission may be due to asymptomatic, but those are from models, so I didn’t include that in my answer yesterday, but wanted to make sure that I covered that here,” Kerkhove said. "

That was of course after they realized putting out the truth did not serve the narrative.

Or it was to provide additional context to just what that that "truth" covered and didn't cover.

[twocoach]

Absolutely terrifying and wrong. They aren't even hiding their sick agenda.





https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/covid-v ... -shot.html

As a broad policy, requiring it is wrong. I don't ever see a city or state requiring it. But on a case by case basis, I understand certain employers requiring it. It depends on the job and the level of risk/exposure. Certain jobs already require drug screenings, others such as certain health care jobs would obviously have minimum vaccination requirements. There was a lot of conversation about this back in 2015 when the big measles outbreak hit Disneyland.