Kansas Crimson

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:44 am just got a nice bit of rain…steady and soaking

but, i call bs on the cooler temps

we shall see

45 and raining in CDA.


Again.

80 and not a cloud in the sky.

again

summertime in Michigan.

and yet here you are posting, rather than being out enjoying

95 and Sunny here.

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-envi ... -west/amp/

if my own first-hand anecdotes are any indication, getting enough people to change their ways and reduce consumption/demand seems like a pie-in-the-sky plan

in today’s news, the SCOTUS continues its effort to reverse decades of progress

smfh

https://www.axios.com/2022/06/30/west-v ... ate-change

Fail.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 10:15 am https://www.axios.com/2022/06/30/west-v ... ate-change

Fail.

Going to be lots of 6-3 decisions.

Speaking of judicial activism……

Is judicial activism more acceptable if you agree with the outcome?

Is it about process or outcome?

judicial activism is LITERALLY when the judiciary sets aside government acts through judicial review

er go, ruling to overturn powers granted by congress

this particular ruling is very much an instance of that

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:07 am judicial activism is LITERALLY when the judiciary sets aside government acts through judicial review

er go, ruling to overturn powers granted by congress

this particular ruling is very much an instance of that

But is it the process or the outcome that bothers you?

Because something tells me it's outcome driven and not process driven. If the majority were flipped and they were using judicial activism to accomplish things you persoanlly agree with I don't think you'd have any issue with it.

and?

i never said it was good or bad…i said this action qualifies

So judicial activism is ok if you agree with the outcome of what is being achieved.

I don't agree with judicial activism, regardless of outcome. But you can't be ok with it when it's your side and then not ok with it when it's the other side.

The left is outcome driven, process be damned. Now they're getting a taste of their own medicine. And the rest of us have to suffer the consequences.

the left went too far left.

no one to blame but themselves.

lol…ok, guy

it’s gonna happen, regardless. it doesn’t matter whether i like it or not. no matter how much we want it to be, the Constitution isn’t a living document. therefore, the three branches of government are going to be forced to make decisions in today’s world.

news flash…there’s also executive/presidential and congressional activism

some would argue that the Bill of Rights was an activist act

there’s absolutely nothing wrong with agreeing with some activism, and disagreeing with others

but, you do you

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:36 am the left went too far left.

no one to blame but themselves.

wut?

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:40 am

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:36 am the left went too far left.

no one to blame but themselves.

wut?

Yea, not connecting this one.
Unless he’s saying the left went too far left so ,to punish the left, the Supreme Court handicapped the government to be able to curb emissions that are proven to be effecting our planets climate.