Page 40 of 42

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 11:07 am
by Deleted User 863
Fascinating stuff! Thanks for sharing!

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 11:26 am
by ousdahl
BasketballJayhawk wrote: Fri Sep 02, 2022 11:07 am Fascinating stuff! Thanks for sharing!
You’re welcome!


Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2022 11:18 am
by ousdahl
Catholic health care's wide reach can make it hard to get birth control in many places

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... ealth-care

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:37 am
by ousdahl

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:53 am
by Cascadia
That’s awesome

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 7:49 pm
by ousdahl
Lindsey Graham lulz

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:58 am
by KUTradition
he just picked 15 weeks…cuz, ya know…it sounded good to him

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:25 am
by twocoach
KUTradition wrote: Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:58 am he just picked 15 weeks…cuz, ya know…it sounded good to him
The GOP is reeling after the unexpected political hit from the Supreme Court gutting Roe vs. Wade. Now they are left to try to figure out a way to not lose as many voters who are completely opposed to what has been done.

"Be careful what you wish for"

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 1:12 pm
by ousdahl
sooo

got a hot take from, oh let's just say, some bisexual hippie chick at the bar.

She/her claims dems COULD codify Roe in this lame duck session if they went nuclear about it....except they won't, and they're not gonna.

Is that so? I think they'd still need 51 votes or whatever, which means getting guys like Manchin on bored, or something?

Or, couldn't Biden sign an EO to accomplish as much too?

I dunno. Mericans have never been great about actually understanding how stuff works.

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 3:39 pm
by TDub
they should codify Roe v Wade...

also stop talking to people in bars and taking that as good information.

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 4:37 pm
by Mjl
Roe vs Wade has nothing to do with budgets, they can't go "nuclear" on it

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 6:05 pm
by Deleted User 863
Mjl wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 4:37 pm Roe vs Wade has nothing to do with budgets, they can't go "nuclear" on it
But saying "if they went nuclear" sounds so cool and edgy. Especially when you do it in a George Bush voice.

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 2:53 pm
by ousdahl
/thread


Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 7:45 am
by TDub
So this is pretty funny...

During the Obama years Wyoming added an amendment that stated that competent adults could make their own health care decisions (to avoid the Obama care requirements)....

Because of that, their recent bid to ban abortion failed on the grounds it directly conflicted with the recently added amendment that stated that "competent adults could make their own health care decisions"

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 9:20 am
by Shirley
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 7:45 am So this is pretty funny...

During the Obama years Wyoming added an amendment that stated that competent adults could make their own health care decisions (to avoid the Obama care requirements)....

Because of that, their recent bid to ban abortion failed on the grounds it directly conflicted with the recently added amendment that stated that "competent adults could make their own health care decisions"
Once republicans decided to abandon their previous deeply held "principals" such as fiscal responsibility, limited government, personal freedom, et al., they keep running into problems with laws they previously alleged to believe in. Because, how can you possibly keep women in their place and dependent on males, i.e., barefoot and pregnant, if they're allowed to decide when and with whom they want to have children?

Less than a month ago the fascist, I mean, republican-controlled legislature in FL got rid of the "resign to run" law, which will allow DeFascist to run for president without requiring him to resign as governor, first.

Another example: Republicans used to own mail-in balloting, but once democrats started catching up and Trump needed fodder for his "rigged election" Big Lie propaganda, they're cutting back on that and a plethora of other measures that make it easier to vote, because the more people who vote, the more likely they are to lose.

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 9:43 am
by KUTradition
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 7:45 am So this is pretty funny...

During the Obama years Wyoming added an amendment that stated that competent adults could make their own health care decisions (to avoid the Obama care requirements)....

Because of that, their recent bid to ban abortion failed on the grounds it directly conflicted with the recently added amendment that stated that "competent adults could make their own health care decisions"
ha!

makes me wonder about the situation for trans adults

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 9:56 am
by TDub
KUTradition wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 9:43 am
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 7:45 am So this is pretty funny...

During the Obama years Wyoming added an amendment that stated that competent adults could make their own health care decisions (to avoid the Obama care requirements)....

Because of that, their recent bid to ban abortion failed on the grounds it directly conflicted with the recently added amendment that stated that "competent adults could make their own health care decisions"
ha!

makes me wonder about the situation for trans adults

well Randy insists thats trans is a mental illness....so I'm sure the powers that be will use that logic to determine that they arent competent adults.

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 10:30 am
by jfish26
Feral wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 9:20 am
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 7:45 am So this is pretty funny...

During the Obama years Wyoming added an amendment that stated that competent adults could make their own health care decisions (to avoid the Obama care requirements)....

Because of that, their recent bid to ban abortion failed on the grounds it directly conflicted with the recently added amendment that stated that "competent adults could make their own health care decisions"
Once republicans decided to abandon their previous deeply held "principals" such as fiscal responsibility, limited government, personal freedom, et al., they keep running into problems with laws they previously alleged to believe in. Because, how can you possibly keep women in their place and dependent on males, i.e., barefoot and pregnant, if they're allowed to decide when and with whom they want to have children?

Less than a month ago the fascist, I mean, republican-controlled legislature in FL got rid of the "resign to run" law, which will allow DeFascist to run for president without requiring him to resign as governor, first.

Another example: Republicans used to own mail-in balloting, but once democrats started catching up and Trump needed fodder for his "rigged election" Big Lie propaganda, they're cutting back on that and a plethora of other measures that make it easier to vote, because the more people who vote, the more likely they are to lose.
Of course, there's so much internal hypocrisy within pubs' own positions on abortion. A couple of my favorites come back to the sanctity of life.*

1 - If life begins at conception (such that all abortions should be banned), then logically it does not follow that exceptions should be made for rape. Incest and other medical complications present medical risks for mother and/or baby...but that's not really true in the context of rape. So, negotiating a rape exception at all sort of nukes the veneer of "seriousness" the pubs bring to the table (and makes it clear that it's about power, not principle).

2 - One would not think that a "sanctity of life" person would support the death penalty, and yet many pubs are strongly anti-abortion and pro-death-penalty (not to mention pro-vigilante-justice).

* The above examples, of course, don't even get into the MYRIAD things pubs do all the fucking time that are very anti-life, like quack public health policy, our disastrous healthcare system, environmental/climate change matters and...of course...the guns.

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 10:32 am
by jfish26
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 9:56 am
KUTradition wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 9:43 am
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 7:45 am So this is pretty funny...

During the Obama years Wyoming added an amendment that stated that competent adults could make their own health care decisions (to avoid the Obama care requirements)....

Because of that, their recent bid to ban abortion failed on the grounds it directly conflicted with the recently added amendment that stated that "competent adults could make their own health care decisions"
ha!

makes me wonder about the situation for trans adults

well Randy insists thats trans is a mental illness....so I'm sure the powers that be will use that logic to determine that they arent competent adults.
Yes. Don't think this positioning is accidental. It would be PERFECTLY down the pub fairway to (1) agree to "people-pleasing" restrictions on gun buying/ownership for people with "mental health issues," and (2) in seemingly-unrelated legislation or litigation, codify transsexuality (or even LGBTQ+ status generally) as a "mental health issue."

Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 11:14 am
by twocoach
jfish26 wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 10:32 am
TDub wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 9:56 am
KUTradition wrote: Sun May 21, 2023 9:43 am

ha!

makes me wonder about the situation for trans adults

well Randy insists thats trans is a mental illness....so I'm sure the powers that be will use that logic to determine that they arent competent adults.
Yes. Don't think this positioning is accidental. It would be PERFECTLY down the pub fairway to (1) agree to "people-pleasing" restrictions on gun buying/ownership for people with "mental health issues," and (2) in seemingly-unrelated legislation or litigation, codify transsexuality (or even LGBTQ+ status generally) as a "mental health issue."
Anyone who choose to be anything other than a white, male, church-going, gun owning heterosexual clearly has mental health issues.