Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 10:53 am
If it's the latter, I'm supposed to take over from here.
If it's the latter, I'm supposed to take over from here.
Couldn't they do it in a simulator now? I am sure that "under the right circumstances" they would train only in simulators and the FAA and the USAF-powers would waive time-critical training requirements. I believe these are "right circumstances". In-home-education math problem: how many unemployed restaurant workers could be paid with the cost of one month's worth of flyovers? I got into it with my sister last week when she used the same argument when the Blue Angels were over the DFW area (her husband works for a defense contractor, so it didn't help ). What does "already paid for" mean? We could not burn all that fuel.......Yes, the salaries are paid but not other expenses. Fly them all you want in f-ing San Diego or Pensacola..........don't tell me you have do all the training all over the US where you have to move all the aircraft and equipment and then get them all back to wherever the Blue Angels are based. I refuse to believe that if we don't do 25-30 shows but only 4 shows somehow the pilots or the aircraft are any less prepared.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 9:39 amI get the sentiment. But those flyovers are also training exercises, which are folded into operational budgets. They're not extra.
One of the B-2 pilots lives not far from me. The B-2 flyovers are actually training bombing runs (precise time-on-target exercises). All computers are 'go' - a specific thing within the stadium is identified as the target.
Simulators are great. Nothing is like the real thing for preparation. At least thats true in everything Ive done, Im not a bomber pilot though.zsn wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 6:03 pmCouldn't they do it in a simulator now? I am sure that "under the right circumstances" they would train only in simulators and the FAA and the USAF-powers would waive time-critical training requirements. I believe these are "right circumstances". In-home-education math problem: how many unemployed restaurant workers could be paid with the cost of one month's worth of flyovers? I got into it with my sister last week when she used the same argument when the Blue Angels were over the DFW area (her husband works for a defense contractor, so it didn't help ). What does "already paid for" mean? We could not burn all that fuel.......Yes, the salaries are paid but not other expenses. Fly them all you want in f-ing San Diego or Pensacola..........don't tell me you have do all the training all over the US where you have to move all the aircraft and equipment and then get them all back to wherever the Blue Angels are based. I refuse to believe that if we don't do 25-30 shows but only 4 shows somehow the pilots or the aircraft are any less prepared.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 9:39 amI get the sentiment. But those flyovers are also training exercises, which are folded into operational budgets. They're not extra.
One of the B-2 pilots lives not far from me. The B-2 flyovers are actually training bombing runs (precise time-on-target exercises). All computers are 'go' - a specific thing within the stadium is identified as the target.
While we're at it........GET OFF MY LAWN
Great analogy.
It's also the case that simulator work doesn't do a lot for the folks whose jobs are more on the maintenance and logistics side of things. Fine enough for pilots and weapons systems operators, but leaves a big gap.TDub wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:37 pmSimulators are great. Nothing is like the real thing for preparation. At least thats true in everything Ive done, Im not a bomber pilot though.zsn wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 6:03 pmCouldn't they do it in a simulator now? I am sure that "under the right circumstances" they would train only in simulators and the FAA and the USAF-powers would waive time-critical training requirements. I believe these are "right circumstances". In-home-education math problem: how many unemployed restaurant workers could be paid with the cost of one month's worth of flyovers? I got into it with my sister last week when she used the same argument when the Blue Angels were over the DFW area (her husband works for a defense contractor, so it didn't help ). What does "already paid for" mean? We could not burn all that fuel.......Yes, the salaries are paid but not other expenses. Fly them all you want in f-ing San Diego or Pensacola..........don't tell me you have do all the training all over the US where you have to move all the aircraft and equipment and then get them all back to wherever the Blue Angels are based. I refuse to believe that if we don't do 25-30 shows but only 4 shows somehow the pilots or the aircraft are any less prepared.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 9:39 am
I get the sentiment. But those flyovers are also training exercises, which are folded into operational budgets. They're not extra.
One of the B-2 pilots lives not far from me. The B-2 flyovers are actually training bombing runs (precise time-on-target exercises). All computers are 'go' - a specific thing within the stadium is identified as the target.
While we're at it........GET OFF MY LAWN
That's rich - coming from you.
Don't let him bother you gutter. Remember this is the same guy who was elated that government employees weren't getting paid during the shutdown.Grandma wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2020 9:22 amThat's rich - coming from you.
As someone who has watched at least 50 Chicago Air & Water Shows (as well as practices) and who has friends and family members "on the front line" of health care, I believe I am entitled to feel a simple once over "fly over" and the alleged reasoning for it - was lame.
If that makes me a "true internet deviant and malcontent", I'm guilty as charged.
Next.
I didn't expect an "air show". I expected a flyover. They flew "over". ONE time. I felt it was lame. That's all. Seems you have an issue with that, right? If so, I got it.
jfish: note emphasized sections of my post. I realize that a lot of preparedness goes into these sophisticated people and machines. However, gallivanting all over the country wasting all sorts of resources is the best of use, especially now. Again, as I said in my last sentence, do we really need x number of flyovers when <x, at their home bases, would suffice??jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2020 9:11 amIt's also the case that simulator work doesn't do a lot for the folks whose jobs are more on the maintenance and logistics side of things. Fine enough for pilots and weapons systems operators, but leaves a big gap.TDub wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:37 pmSimulators are great. Nothing is like the real thing for preparation. At least thats true in everything Ive done, Im not a bomber pilot though.zsn wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 6:03 pm
We could not burn all that fuel.......Yes, the salaries are paid but not other expenses. Fly them all you want in f-ing San Diego or Pensacola..........don't tell me you have do all the training all over the US where you have to move all the aircraft and equipment and then get them all back to wherever the Blue Angels are based. I refuse to believe that if we don't do 25-30 shows but only 4 shows somehow the pilots or the aircraft are any less prepared.