Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2021 10:58 am
to steal a phrase from comma'la harris:
"never let a good crisis go to waste. with crisis comes power"
"never let a good crisis go to waste. with crisis comes power"
Always fun when you can't tell if the bigotry is intentional or just ignorant.
Right, and this is new. Something increases the predicted number of people who die in a year by 20% and it's a big deal. Someone who doesn't recognize that is the person who doesn't understand numbers.jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 10:03 amBut you're looking at all of this in a vacuum. In practice, these are 15,000 hospital beds not available for people with other issues. 15,000 instances of finite resources (people, equipment, time, etc.) being needlessly wasted, largely because people threw a toddler rage-fit over getting the damn shots.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 9:28 amThe number was hospitalizations not deaths. But yeah. They've had plenty of chances to get vaccinated if they wanted to go that route. Illness and death is just a normal part of the human experience. Covid falls into that at this point. Its been 2 years. Accept things and move forward. Like I said these numbers sound big but its a really really small portion of our population. Our population is just too big in general and too big for most people to rationalize
You are correct that that's 15,000 instances of (stupid) individual decisionmaking. But it affects lots and lots and lots of other people, like people who need those resources.
dub needs a codpiece wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 10:06 am It’s 25,000 ICU beds. Statistically 15,000 of those will die. But 25,000 is about 40% of all ICU beds in this country. People do need the beds for other things.
Speaking of numbers, 12,000 being added to the death toll in NY after Cuomo covered up those numbers. But I mean 12,000, who cares.
https://apnews.com/article/andrew-cuomo ... _medium=AP
New, and (relatedly) unanticipated in terms of resource needs. There just isn't this sort of excess capacity lying around unused.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 11:21 amRight, and this is new. Something increases the predicted number of people who die in a year by 20% and it's a big deal. Someone who doesn't recognize that is the person who doesn't understand numbers.jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 10:03 amBut you're looking at all of this in a vacuum. In practice, these are 15,000 hospital beds not available for people with other issues. 15,000 instances of finite resources (people, equipment, time, etc.) being needlessly wasted, largely because people threw a toddler rage-fit over getting the damn shots.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 9:28 am
The number was hospitalizations not deaths. But yeah. They've had plenty of chances to get vaccinated if they wanted to go that route. Illness and death is just a normal part of the human experience. Covid falls into that at this point. Its been 2 years. Accept things and move forward. Like I said these numbers sound big but its a really really small portion of our population. Our population is just too big in general and too big for most people to rationalize
You are correct that that's 15,000 instances of (stupid) individual decisionmaking. But it affects lots and lots and lots of other people, like people who need those resources.
Which is what makes the argument that it's only killing the old and very sick, such a dumb argument. If the virus was mostly killing people on their death bed, you wouldn't see this massive spike in total deaths.
Right, and the impact it had on flu should give you some indication of how bad covid would be if we'd done nothing.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 11:29 am Seems only deaths that would have been down are flu and car wrecks. Which, you can look at covid restrictions playing a large part in keeping those numbers down.
You realize this outbreak is very bad for those in charge politically... Don't you?
the new administration is killing it.