When applied to species extinxtion? Lol not really. Fine think of it on a biological scale. We are seeing it withing human generations. Its obviously an issue. Much bigger than covidtwocoach wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:56 pmGeologically speaking, a million years is a speck of sand in the desert so that's a pretty dumb scale to apply to everything just to support your POV.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:54 pm I've never watched a single YouTube conspiracy. The earth is in a mass extinction period right now. Of everything around us. Its happening at a really fast pace. Geologically speaking. Just consider things
COVID-19 - On the Ground
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
And?randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:58 pm So certain countries (like ours) have stable or slowly declining populations. Part of that stems from the aging baby boomers too. And our government is looking at it from a future taxpayer point of view. But the global population is still on its exponential growth curve. Even through this pandemic. So our country could easily stabilize its population through immigration
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Remember those guys that came back from winter break and they had the entire world's history and problems completely figured and solved because they took Western Civ 1 in the fall semester?
For some reason being reminded of that.
For some reason being reminded of that.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Yeah. He’s at letter “P”. Phucking lunatic.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:51 pmGuy is 2-3 Facebook clicks from going full Q.jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:51 pmNever go full lobster.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:50 pm And to the people looking at this from a finite resources point of view. The earth is not about to sustainably support 8 billion people. Not with the current way we go about things. Finite system which has surpassed its carrying capacity. So a slow 1 percent decrease in population is technically a solution not a problem.
If you beleive this virus came from a lab in Wuhan, which seems likely, that both the Chinese and even our own government had some involvement with, than you should start to wonder why they are experimenting with gain of function viruses. And if you consider those factors, i am very interested to hear what conclusions some of you come to
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
This isn't a one or the other scenario so it is completely irrelevant in the discussion of covid.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:59 pmWhen applied to species extinxtion? Lol not really. Fine think of it on a biological scale. We are seeing it withing human generations. Its obviously an issue. Much bigger than covidtwocoach wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:56 pmGeologically speaking, a million years is a speck of sand in the desert so that's a pretty dumb scale to apply to everything just to support your POV.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:54 pm I've never watched a single YouTube conspiracy. The earth is in a mass extinction period right now. Of everything around us. Its happening at a really fast pace. Geologically speaking. Just consider things
We get it, you don't think covid is important despite the massive global impact it has had so far.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Notice I said "if you beleive this"CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:51 pmGuy is 2-3 Facebook clicks from going full Q.jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:51 pmNever go full lobster.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:50 pm And to the people looking at this from a finite resources point of view. The earth is not about to sustainably support 8 billion people. Not with the current way we go about things. Finite system which has surpassed its carrying capacity. So a slow 1 percent decrease in population is technically a solution not a problem.
If you beleive this virus came from a lab in Wuhan, which seems likely, that both the Chinese and even our own government had some involvement with, than you should start to wonder why they are experimenting with gain of function viruses. And if you consider those factors, i am very interested to hear what conclusions some of you come to
None of us on this message board have all the answers. But its silly to not consider possibilities. And you can't deny the pieces fit. And im open to hearing other possibilities or explanations for why a lab with funding and scientists from multiple countries would be studying gain of function viruses?
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
It's like when a teenager starts a sentence with "All we need to do is..." you can all but guarantee it isn't "all that needs to be done".CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:02 pm Remember those guys that came back from winter break and they had the entire world's history and problems completely figured and solved because they took Western Civ 1 in the fall semester?
For some reason being reminded of that.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
covid is important. some of the stupid S#!t we are doing to combat it is not. for instance, wearing a mask outdoors, wearing a mask indoors if you are vaxxed, making the children wear a mask.
the stupid has far outweighed the unstupid.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Exactly. Covid isn't a sham. But most the tactics we have used and politicians demand are not effective or even worth doing. And a lot of businesses play along at least in name (most dont enforce or even give a shit) so that they can protect their image from cancel culture. The main thing it does do is piss people off and create further divide within our society.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
It would be really interesting if covid19 happened 20 years ago before social media or the internet progressed to where it is now. It would have played out completely different
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
To say that this "would be studying gain of function viruses" is fact would be disingenuous. There is widespread disagreement as to whether that was happening. Seems like it is a very subjective topic that can lend itself to confirmation bias.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:04 pmNotice I said "if you beleive this"
None of us on this message board have all the answers. But its silly to not consider possibilities. And you can't deny the pieces fit. And im open to hearing other possibilities or explanations for why a lab with funding and scientists from multiple countries would be studying gain of function viruses?
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
20 years ago our society wasn't nearly as soft or sensitive either. There are pros and cons to that of course. But in relation to covid I dont see a lot of benefit from how we are handling things
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Yeah there is widespread disagreement. That's why I continually say "if this is true."twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:18 pmTo say that this "would be studying gain of function viruses" is fact would be disingenuous. There is widespread disagreement as to whether that was happening. Seems like it is a very subjective topic that can lend itself to confirmation bias.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:04 pmNotice I said "if you beleive this"
None of us on this message board have all the answers. But its silly to not consider possibilities. And you can't deny the pieces fit. And im open to hearing other possibilities or explanations for why a lab with funding and scientists from multiple countries would be studying gain of function viruses?
I'm not claiming it is true. I dont know. Neither does anyone posting on here. But a lot of the pieces fit. And if you take an honest glance at how everything has been handled it seems a lot more likely that it is true. But maybe its not
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
With your three points I 1) disagree in certain situations 2) disagree entirely and 3) vehemently disagree.
There are probably some situations where wearing a mask outside would be a good idea if the ventilation isn't good and people are too crowded together. Tell me to wear a mask outside while riding my bike and you can fuck off with that noise. Wearing a mask inside while vaxxed? AS we have seen, the vaccine does not prevent covid spread. It just reduces it. Masks reduce it further whether you are vaxxed or unvaxxed so I have zero problem continuing to wear one. And kids? They aren't vaxxinated and have little self control to keep socially distant or to keep their hands to themselves and out of their hands, mouths and noses. Having kids wear masks at school is common sense and not doing it is freaking dumb and irresponsible.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
So those of you claiming I've gone "full lobster" lets just pump the brakes. Im just wanting you to honestly consider possibilities. Im not claiming to know all or trying to convince you.
The only thing I'm asking is to see other perspectives and give an honest inquiry into other possibilities. Remove your bias and just consider it
The only thing I'm asking is to see other perspectives and give an honest inquiry into other possibilities. Remove your bias and just consider it
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Man, you're rolling out all the crotchedly old white guy complaints today. Didn't think we'd see "this soft generation" mixed in to a discussion of a global pandemic yet here we are.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:20 pm 20 years ago our society wasn't nearly as soft or sensitive either. There are pros and cons to that of course. But in relation to covid I dont see a lot of benefit from how we are handling things
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Masks are not that effective. Its 100 degrees. If you are in a situation where you are outside on a 100° day and think you or others should be wearing masks, you need to just stay home
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Its true tho. There are benefits to a more sensitive accepting society. But there are certainly drawbacks to it as well. Ask bill self what he thinks about a team that is softtwocoach wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:25 pmMan, you're rolling out all the crotchedly old white guy complaints today. Didn't think we'd see "this soft generation" mixed in to a discussion of a global pandemic yet here we are.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:20 pm 20 years ago our society wasn't nearly as soft or sensitive either. There are pros and cons to that of course. But in relation to covid I dont see a lot of benefit from how we are handling things
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
You asked us to consider the reasons WHY something happened when we aren't even remotely sure that it happened.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:24 pm So those of you claiming I've gone "full lobster" lets just pump the brakes. Im just wanting you to honestly consider possibilities. Im not claiming to know all or trying to convince you.
The only thing I'm asking is to see other perspectives and give an honest inquiry into other possibilities. Remove your bias and just consider it