Kansas Crimson

NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:47 pm

Sparko wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:38 pm KC has a significant advantage at QB all things being equal, and we all know it. But the thing that makes any QB look like Trent Dilfer is getting sacked repeatedly or having to throw under duress. Mahomes is the best ever at throwing under duress which is why I am hopeful KC will squeak out a win. But the Buc's have a significant advantage with their D-Line versus KCs O-Line. Montana was better than Brady IMHO, having seen them both, anyway. He is GOAT of a depleted QB era, that is now restocked. SF was much better overall than Tampa Bay, but full-strength KC is the best team in the NFL. A depleted O-Line KC is a worry to me. It won't even make the post-game analysis if KC loses, because Brady. But it is a significant issue, especially remembering how "meh" KC was without Fish last year.

A depleted QB era? Please explain. Manning, Big Ben, Brees, Rivers, Wilson and Rodgers are all Hall of Famers. He battled all those guys constantly.

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:04 pm

NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:47 pm

Sparko wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:38 pm KC has a significant advantage at QB all things being equal, and we all know it. But the thing that makes any QB look like Trent Dilfer is getting sacked repeatedly or having to throw under duress. Mahomes is the best ever at throwing under duress which is why I am hopeful KC will squeak out a win. But the Buc's have a significant advantage with their D-Line versus KCs O-Line. Montana was better than Brady IMHO, having seen them both, anyway. He is GOAT of a depleted QB era, that is now restocked. SF was much better overall than Tampa Bay, but full-strength KC is the best team in the NFL. A depleted O-Line KC is a worry to me. It won't even make the post-game analysis if KC loses, because Brady. But it is a significant issue, especially remembering how "meh" KC was without Fish last year.

A depleted QB era? Please explain. Manning, Big Ben, Brees, Rivers, Wilson and Rodgers are all Hall of Famers. He battled all those guys constantly.

Brady's played in a Super Bowl under 4 different Presidents. Weak era gets thrown out when you last that long.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:22 pm

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:04 pm

NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:47 pm

A depleted QB era? Please explain. Manning, Big Ben, Brees, Rivers, Wilson and Rodgers are all Hall of Famers. He battled all those guys constantly.

Brady's played in a Super Bowl under 4 different Presidents. Weak era gets thrown out when you last that long.

Obviously there's more that went into it besides Brady, but...you're not talking about a down QB era if Brady kept two rings (making him all-timer in any case) and distributed four of them among the [Manning/Ben/Brees/Rivers/Wilson/Rodgers] group.

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:29 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:22 pm

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:04 pm

Brady's played in a Super Bowl under 4 different Presidents. Weak era gets thrown out when you last that long.

Obviously there's more that went into it besides Brady, but...you're not talking about a down QB era if Brady kept two rings (making him all-timer in any case) and distributed four of them among the [Manning/Ben/Brees/Rivers/Wilson/Rodgers] group.

Manning squared plus Kurt Warner.


I think Rodgers and Wilson are probably the start of the inflated QB stat era. Which, Mahomes is firmly in but he also looks better than everyone else just 3 seasons in.

holidaysmore wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:44 am Sammy has a ton of incentive money riding on this Super Bowl game and with him missing half of the regular season and the money that came with that my guess would be he goes. I also saw him featured on the Chiefs Instagram page with his SB jersey on. He plays. How well or long I have no idea. This has to be his last game as Chief, right?

pdub wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:07 pm Eh - when healthy, he's got speed and height.
Someone would take a 1 year flier ( cough cough Raiders? ) .

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:54 am I'm hoping I don't need to quote-reply this some time later this week, but: it blows my mind that they didn't move the Super Bowl back a week and hard-bubble both teams in Tampa starting in the middle of last week.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:54 am I'm hoping I don't need to quote-reply this some time later this week, but: it blows my mind that they didn't move the Super Bowl back a week and hard-bubble both teams in Tampa starting in the middle of last week.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:30 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:54 am I'm hoping I don't need to quote-reply this some time later this week, but: it blows my mind that they didn't move the Super Bowl back a week and hard-bubble both teams in Tampa starting in the middle of last week.

NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:31 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:30 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:54 am I'm hoping I don't need to quote-reply this some time later this week, but: it blows my mind that they didn't move the Super Bowl back a week and hard-bubble both teams in Tampa starting in the middle of last week.

You're too fucking fast.

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:47 pm what does that designation mean?

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:47 pm what does that designation mean?

NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:05 pm

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:47 pm what does that designation mean?

They have to test negative for 5 consecutive days. Probably won't know until Saturday if they can play unless they test positive during the week, then they are done.