Kansas Crimson

William Taylor's 10/22 deposition, released last week, contains the following question, un-redacted, asked by Steve Castor, committee staff counsel, "Does a person by the name of ******* ring a bell for you?”

(The redaction here is mine, natch).

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00 ... 0-D008.pdf

In case I haven't already said it today, "Lindsey Graham is a hypocritical piece of shit".

Extremism in defense of Trump is no vice...

This is scary

Mjl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:17 amThis is scary

and sad

“All roads with you lead to Putin”:

From Rick Wilson's twitter today

I will max out to any member of the impeachment committee who tells Gym Jordan to sit down until he admits he saw in the showers and why he covered up sexual abuse of athletes in his program.

Public hearing bump!

Taylor revealed a previously unknown line to Trump from Sondland, tying the extortion of Zelensky directly to Trump.

I guess it's time for the Intelligence Community Inspector General's time in the barrel, because he was unloyal to Trump when he forwarded the whistle blower's complaint to congress. What a surprise that our POS in chief would consider exacting retribution on anyone who isn't a team player. Tribalism on steroids. And republicans enable and protect him. Because
"Law and Order Party"!

Feral wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:45 pm Taylor revealed a previously unknown line to Trump from Sondland, tying the extortion of Zelensky directly to Trump.

Huge mistake. Now, if Sondland and the staffer testify in a way that Trump doesn't like, he can't rebut it without going all Sondland and revising his previous statement which will undermine his credibility. That is, if he had any credibility to lose.

Jim Jordan says this is all a nothing burger. It's like when some weird old dude walks up to you in the gym shower and starts jacking on your leg, I mean so what? Get over it! It's good to have a strident common sense and decency conservative like that around to put everything into trumpublican perspective for us.

Two very credible witnesses that should be taken at their word.

Geezer wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:15 pm Two very credible witnesses that should be taken at their word.

Wrong!!!



Who could have possibly guessed that republicans would resort to impugning the witnesses, just because the facts make it clear they're enabling the most corrupt president in our nation's history? And all the while obstructing the investigation by not releasing documents or allowing the people who were in the room to testify. But


"heresay"

#lawandorderparty

i just keep thinking BENGHAZI!!

Did anyone catch Pelosi explaining the word "exculpatory" to DFIC? Speaking of nothing burger.....'exculpatory evidence' would be that.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1 ... ut-the-sun

zsn wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:46 pm Did anyone catch Pelosi explaining the word "exculpatory" to DFIC? Speaking of nothing burger.....'exculpatory evidence' would be that.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1 ... ut-the-sun

^^^

A lawyer I once slept with guffawed robustly when we heard that.

Pelosi trolling Trump, is there anything that would make him more angry?



Longer version: