Page 45 of 530

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:52 am
by Deleted User 75
Wasn't trying to be a smart ass at all.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:53 am
by twocoach
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:19 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:14 am
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:11 am

i was more referring to fave-to-face bullying, by peers and classmates...vs being bullied on social media

not even considering actual physical bullying, which is a whole different can of worms
Look at this place. It's a prime example of what kids face. We are all WAY nastier to each other here than we ever would be face to face. And kids have jello pudding between their ears.
i can honestly say i’m not. i don’t say anything on here that i wouldn’t say to someone’s face
And there are a few others who are probably in the same boat. So we arent ALL. Just many. My bad.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:55 am
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:52 am Wasn't trying to be a smart ass at all.
Then I will take a closer look at that link at some point to see what it is.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:11 pm
by Deleted User 62
Anyone want some of what Rudy is smoking?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... spartandhp

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:19 pm
by defixione
So it's come down to "They're not God, after all. They could be wrong" as a basis of defense for Trump's legal team?

Unbelievable.

I still think it's funny that no one in Trump's camp will allow him to be questioned on his own cuz he can't tell the truth.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:22 pm
by seahawk
Would think that cyberbullying and in person bullying may be separate categories for those who publish social science research, but not necessarily for mean kids who could use both to damage their classmates. It only takes one high antisocial kid to wreak major havoc in another teen's life.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:40 pm
by Deleted User 62
defixione wrote: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:19 pm So it's come down to "They're not God, after all. They could be wrong" as a basis of defense for Trump's legal team?

Unbelievable.

I still think it's funny that no one in Trump's camp will allow him to be questioned on his own cuz he can't tell the truth.
I wonder if it Rudy's job to just spout completely ridiculous crap so that Donny John looks somewhat intelligent?

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:38 pm
by Deleted User 89
truth isn’t truth

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:50 am
by Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:54 am
by Deleted User 89
nothing like quoting pat buchanon to prove you aren’t racist

https://www.vox.com/2019/1/14/18181897/ ... lumn-tweet

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:31 pm
by Deleted User 183

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:30 pm
by Geezer

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:42 pm
by Deleted User 89
he can make it from the oval office if he wants...

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:59 pm
by Deleted User 75
LOL for sure.

Guess we know this means it'll be from the Oval Office. There will be good basketball on anyway so I'll do the cliff notes version.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:05 pm
by twocoach
That's freaking hilarious. What a boss move by Pelosi. Trump has to be livid.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:09 pm
by Geezer

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:42 pm
by zsn
TraditionKU wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:42 pm he can make it from the oval office if he wants...
Isn't there some Constitutional requirement that it be "delivered to Congress"? If it is from the Oval Office, it may not be allowed to be called SOTU. Also, IIRC, it doesn't have to be exactly in January and doesn't also have to be delivered in person. Could just be a written document, like Nancy says he could do. Boss move, indeed.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:51 pm
by Deleted User 75
twocoach wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:05 pm
Trump has to be livid.
I thought the exact opposite. Now he won't have to face the embarrassment of having many members of congress not stand and clap ritualistically after all of his grand declarations.

This is probably a net positive for trump if he elects to give it from the Oval Office instead.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:10 pm
by Deleted User 62
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:51 pm
twocoach wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:05 pm
Trump has to be livid.
I thought the exact opposite. Now he won't have to face the embarrassment of having many members of congress not stand and clap ritualistically after all of his grand declarations.

This is probably a net positive for trump if he elects to give it from the Oval Office instead.
Also, he can use that time to tell us about the roving band of raping murderers carrying heroin across through the desert.

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:40 pm
by twocoach
zsn wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:42 pm
TraditionKU wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:42 pm he can make it from the oval office if he wants...
Isn't there some Constitutional requirement that it be "delivered to Congress"? If it is from the Oval Office, it may not be allowed to be called SOTU. Also, IIRC, it doesn't have to be exactly in January and doesn't also have to be delivered in person. Could just be a written document, like Nancy says he could do. Boss move, indeed.
"He shall from time to time give to Congress information of the State of the Union and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient."

He could deliver it in June from the toilet during his morning bowel movement like he does the rest of his policy decisions if he chose to.