2024/2025 Lineup

Kansas Basketball.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by ousdahl »

but I guess I can dig Self's apparent strategy of stockpiling SG/SF perimeter players outta the portal.

the 2 and 3 spots are up for grabs, so just load up on a bunch of them on the odds a couple will work out.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by twocoach »

ousdahl wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 7:22 am yea, I saw that. But at 6'7" I kinda assumed he plays like more of a wing, and "guard" may be used as a catch-all perimeter player sort of term. Other media lists him as a forward. If he is more of a guard, it's almost certainly as an off-the-ball shooting guard more so than a lead. What do you think?

apparently he was B12 sixth man of the year tho? And had 18 points in a win against us? I dunno if I remember this dood.
He is probably the best player available at the position KU is looking for. Kentucky is probably the leader for him if he doesn't stay in the draft but nice to see KU getting in on him. Hopefully it's not too late.
DeletedUser
Posts: 5025
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by DeletedUser »

ousdahl wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 7:22 am yea, I saw that. But at 6'7" I kinda assumed he plays like more of a wing, and "guard" may be used as a catch-all perimeter player sort of term. Other media lists him as a forward. If he is more of a guard, it's almost certainly as an off-the-ball shooting guard more so than a lead. What do you think?

apparently he was B12 sixth man of the year tho? And had 18 points in a win against us? I dunno if I remember this dood.
I don't remember him either.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13862
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by KUTradition »

if i recall, he was a pretty big piece to BYU’s successes, coming off the bench but leading them in scoring
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by twocoach »

He made more threes in the BYU win at AFH than the entire KU roster.

Robinson: 4-9
Kansas: 3-15
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15504
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by TDub »

DeletedUser wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 8:10 am
ousdahl wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 7:22 am yea, I saw that. But at 6'7" I kinda assumed he plays like more of a wing, and "guard" may be used as a catch-all perimeter player sort of term. Other media lists him as a forward. If he is more of a guard, it's almost certainly as an off-the-ball shooting guard more so than a lead. What do you think?

apparently he was B12 sixth man of the year tho? And had 18 points in a win against us? I dunno if I remember this dood.
I don't remember him either.
really? he was solid, we couldn't stop him. I'd take him for sure.
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by ousdahl »

7 foot wingspan

yes please
User avatar
mjl2
Contributor
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2023 11:46 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by mjl2 »

Robinson is a stud.
User avatar
mjl2
Contributor
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2023 11:46 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by mjl2 »

If we end up with him instead of Furphy, this team is going to have a lot of wings with size, and some real shooters.

But the issue is going to be making up for McCullar and Furphy's rebounding.
Per 40 rebounding last year:
Robinson - 3.8 (Yikes)
Storr - 5.5
Griffen - 5.1
Adams - 5.4

vs
McCullar - 7.0
Furphy - 8.2

FWIW, I don't really think of Mayo as a wing, but he actually averaged 6.3, so, better than the wings.
User avatar
randylahey
Posts: 8970
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by randylahey »

I wouldn't worry about rebounding. We have a deep athletic team. These guys are competing for minutes. They will be fresh and competing for minutes. They'll be going after rebounds
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by twocoach »

mjl2 wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 12:48 pm If we end up with him instead of Furphy, this team is going to have a lot of wings with size, and some real shooters.

But the issue is going to be making up for McCullar and Furphy's rebounding.
Per 40 rebounding last year:
Robinson - 3.8 (Yikes)
Storr - 5.5
Griffen - 5.1
Adams - 5.4

vs
McCullar - 7.0
Furphy - 8.2

FWIW, I don't really think of Mayo as a wing, but he actually averaged 6.3, so, better than the wings.
Maybe they will make up for it by making some damn shots and not having so many rebounds available.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by ousdahl »

Speaking of “Small” guards, anyone got anything on that Oklahoma State dood who apparently hasn’t signed with West Virginia yet?
User avatar
randylahey
Posts: 8970
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by randylahey »

twocoach wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 1:28 pm
mjl2 wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 12:48 pm If we end up with him instead of Furphy, this team is going to have a lot of wings with size, and some real shooters.

But the issue is going to be making up for McCullar and Furphy's rebounding.
Per 40 rebounding last year:
Robinson - 3.8 (Yikes)
Storr - 5.5
Griffen - 5.1
Adams - 5.4

vs
McCullar - 7.0
Furphy - 8.2

FWIW, I don't really think of Mayo as a wing, but he actually averaged 6.3, so, better than the wings.
Maybe they will make up for it by making some damn shots and not having so many rebounds available.
Are you implying mccullar and furphy had inflated rebounding stats cause we couldn't shoot? Lol
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by twocoach »

Nah, just sad and venting that last year's team couldn't shoot worth a shit. Although nearly a third of Furphy's rebounds were offensive boards so maybe it would help cushion it a bit.

Someone will fill the void and rebound. Self will deal with that. That's mostly a positioning, assignment and effort thing, not an ability thing.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13862
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by KUTradition »

i’m hoping Bidunka has a TRob-esque motor and gobbles up boards like they’re going out of style
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
AlOerter
Contributor
Posts: 3211
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:02 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by AlOerter »

I’ve always said that rebounding is more of an attitude than anything else. Rodman tried to get every board instead of turning around and heading down the floor. Even when he didn’t have position he tried to keep it alive and tip it to himself.

Reading where the miss is going to come off seems to be another lost art for many players.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18648
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by jfish26 »

randylahey wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 1:13 pm I wouldn't worry about rebounding. We have a deep athletic team. These guys are competing for minutes. They will be fresh and competing for minutes. They'll be going after rebounds
I don’t think we can (in the context of rebounding anyway) call this team athletic, particularly in the frontcourt.

Hunter and Zach are minus athletes. KJ’s athleticism has yet to translate to even average rebounding. And lord knows what (or how much) we’ll get out of Bidunga.
DeletedUser
Posts: 5025
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by DeletedUser »

jfish26 wrote: Sat May 18, 2024 11:37 am
randylahey wrote: Fri May 17, 2024 1:13 pm I wouldn't worry about rebounding. We have a deep athletic team. These guys are competing for minutes. They will be fresh and competing for minutes. They'll be going after rebounds
I don’t think we can (in the context of rebounding anyway) call this team athletic, particularly in the frontcourt.

Hunter and Zach are minus athletes. KJ’s athleticism has yet to translate to even average rebounding. And lord knows what (or how much) we’ll get out of Bidunga.
Rebounding will be a key to our success. Defensive rebounding.

Bidunga will play 10-12mpg at most, unless we find a way to play he and Hunter together. Which seems unlikely at this point, but Self and Co. have all summer to try to get Bidunga ready for that.

I think it's almost a certainty that HD plays 30mpg. Same with KJ. Same with DH. I am good with that. I think we have the pieces around them to make that work.

What we really need is for Storr to get into a groove with playing off of DH and KJ, because those two are willing and effective passers when at their best. He needs to be our go to guy. I do not think we want it to be HD, but maybe I am wrong and he will develop that over the summer.

HD was very good last year. Almost nobody spends time with Self and doesn't get better. I expect that we will see an improved HD.

Self gets #3 next year. Place your bets now.
User avatar
mjl2
Contributor
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2023 11:46 pm

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by mjl2 »

AlOerter wrote: Sat May 18, 2024 10:29 am I’ve always said that rebounding is more of an attitude than anything else. Rodman tried to get every board instead of turning around and heading down the floor. Even when he didn’t have position he tried to keep it alive and tip it to himself.

Reading where the miss is going to come off seems to be another lost art for many players.
Or just play the percentages and go for the weak side. I remember when doing player-tracking stuff being shocked how many misses went to the weak side.

But I suppose that makes sense, right? Momentum of the ball is going that direction.
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15504
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: 2024/2025 Lineup

Post by TDub »

yes, weakside gets more rebounds, players have tendencies too, some guys typically miss short, the great rebounds know the players and where they miss most often. Long shots long rebounds usually etc...
Just Ledoux it
Post Reply