Kansas Crimson

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:32 am

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:12 am A. No whack jobs

B. No whack jobs

So far all the so called front runners are whack jobs.

A Republican labeling all of the dozen Democratic contenders as "whack jobs". Shocking.
You understand that there IS no democrat that you would fail to consider a whack job, right?

To expand on twocoach's point, can you name ONE Dem who you would vote for President, regardless of whether (s)he is/was (since 2004) in any race?

FTR, I can't think of any Republican I would have voted for any office in recent memory (except once: Ahnolt for Guv in 2006 - the Dem nominee was a neophyte and the incumbent was essentially a RINO). In my book, anyone who supports and stands by a confessed sexual assaulter is automatically disqualified from holding elected office; especially on behalf of a party which claims to be the self-professed protector of "family values". This is also the party which allegedly upholds "value of traditional marriage" whose leaders have EACH upheld said "traditional values" multiple times, between bouts of serial adultery.

I voted for bo his first go around.

Do democrats cheat on their spouses? Probably not I reckon.

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:01 pm Do democrats cheat on their spouses? Probably not I reckon.

Of course, just like lots of people do no matter their political ideas or affiliation.

Which is precisely why it is so lame of republicans to constantly pretend, "Moral Majority", "Family Values" party, etc., that they don't. Who do they think they're fooling*?












*Michhawk

Almost all the democrats I know favor good morals and family values and the such. Not so with the likes you hang with?

Maybe you should find a better class of folks to hang with.

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:01 pm Do democrats cheat on their spouses? Probably not I reckon.

everyone cheats on their spouses, regardless of politics

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:10 pm Almost all the democrats I know favor good morals and family values and the such.

i’d wager they don’t all practice what the preach

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:01 pm Do democrats cheat on their spouses? Probably not I reckon.

Do democrats try to regulate who can and cannot be our spouses? No.

Having the party that claims to know how to cure all of what is "wrong" with our society back someone who has violated basically everything on that list deserves the mocking. The only thing worse than a crook is a crooked cop.

You’re on here all day everyday preaching to anyone that will listen. So what’s the difference.

They think they know what’s right. You think you know what’s right. Who are we supposed to believe?

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:44 pm You’re on here all day everyday preaching to anyone that will listen. So what’s the difference.

They think they know what’s right. You think you know what’s right. Who are we supposed to believe?

You're kidding, right?

Maybe, just maybe, some people know that if they claim a virtue that they don't possess, and especially if they shout the possession of that virtue constantly in bumper stickers, advertisements, campaign materials, etc., etc., in an effort to obtain people's support, when they're revealed not to practice that virtue, it makes them look like hypocrites, and people will be less likely to believe anything they say. Of course, no person of even average intellect would still trust them, right? Except, maybe you?

#fiscalresponsibilityparty...

Oh my, Hillary ended Tulsi's plan to be Vice-President, or a 3rd party spoiler. Gonna be difficult for the bots from St. Petersburg to overcome that one.

Not really....plus Clinton back tracked and claimed the "they" she referred to was republicans and not Russians. "Queen Warmonger" isn't capable of ruining anyone except herself. So glad she didn't win the presidency. I'm glad the 1st woman president won't be her.

you’re bay shit fucking crazy if you still, after all we’ve seen, think we’re better off as a nation with drumpf over hillary

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:34 pm you’re bay shit fucking crazy if you still, after all we’ve seen, think we’re better off as a nation with drumpf over hillary

Impossible to know/say, and it's a pointless debate at this point. Trump has been a lot worse than I thought he'd be (and I thought he'd be pretty bad), I'll admit that.

But fwiw, I didn't mean my original comment to imply I was happy trump is president, only that I was/am happy Hillary isn't president...

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:10 pm Almost all the democrats I know favor good morals and family values and the such. Not so with the likes you hang with?

Maybe you should find a better class of folks to hang with.

Do you have some sort of point with any of this?

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:47 pm Impossible to know/say, and it's a pointless debate at this point. Trump has been a lot worse than I thought he'd be (and I thought he'd be pretty bad), I'll admit that.

It's not like it was exactly a secret what kind of President that Trump would have been. Everyone who had two functioning brain cells knew he was an incompetent corrupt Russian asset and compromised by all the money laundering he was doing for the Russian mafia and the Saudis. It wasn't exactly a secret that had literally no accomplishments to speak of, and that he was selling stuff that would never be achieved (how's that Mexican-paid wall coming along, BTW).

At least now you admit that you were wrong.......not that you weren't warned!

zsn wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 2:12 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:47 pm Impossible to know/say, and it's a pointless debate at this point. Trump has been a lot worse than I thought he'd be (and I thought he'd be pretty bad), I'll admit that.

It's not like it was exactly a secret what kind of President that Trump would have been. Everyone who had two functioning brain cells knew he was an incompetent corrupt Russian asset and compromised by all the money laundering he was doing for the Russian mafia and the Saudis. It wasn't exactly a secret that had literally no accomplishments to speak of, and that he was selling stuff that would never be achieved (how's that Mexican-paid wall coming along, BTW).

At least now you admit that you were wrong.......not that you weren't warned!

100% agree. Nothing he has done surprises me other than how open and honest he has been about being such a scumbag. I thought he would have tried a little harder to hide what a huge transactional racist he is.

So cankles and Gabbard are tweeter sparring. Anyone else think they are in cahoots to get Gabbard's name on cnn?

I see a Buttigieg arisin'...

Dems are going to kick themselves if they let Warren hand Trump 4 more years in the white house. I do not think she can appeal to enough moderates/unhappy republicans to beat trump. If they don't go with 1 of the others and she doesn't win, I'm blaming Dems for 4 more years of Trump (if he hasn't been removed from office by then).