Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:10 am
All Things Kansas.
https://www.kansascrimson.com/boards/
I only really cared about the Big 12 title when matching and setting the all-time record. All other years, great if we get it, but not at the expense of getting the team in the best position for the NCAA tournament where all teams' success is ultimately judged.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:53 amSure. All true. I just mean a big 12 title absent of a natty doesn't move the needle for me any more now that the streak has ended.
Maybe it is a shitty needle. But when you've been the most dominant program for the last 4ish decades and have only 1 natty to show for it, that just isn't going to feel completely satisfying.
Can someone describe this mythical scenario where trying to win the Big 12 title comes "at the expense of" KU being in a better position to win a national title? I hear this argument all the time but no one can provide a logical example of what that would ever be. It's usually just assumptions that someone younger didn't get enough minutes and "would have been the difference if he was allowed to develop in Big 12 play with more minutes" which is pure assumption that is rarely likely to have actually been realistic.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:10 amI only really cared about the Big 12 title when matching and setting the all-time record. All other years, great if we get it, but not at the expense of getting the team in the best position for the NCAA tournament where all teams' success is ultimately judged.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:53 amSure. All true. I just mean a big 12 title absent of a natty doesn't move the needle for me any more now that the streak has ended.
The joy of winning a conference championship dissipates in a matter of days at Kansas Basketball.
Not for me at all. Winning the conference means that you beat a lot of really good teams and I get the most enjoyment from Kansas beating really good teams as often as possible. Isn't that the point of the sport?
It's not an either/or thing. I enjoy watching Kansas play and win games. Would I be more satisfied if they won more national titles? Sure, but as a Kansas fan, I am already very satisfied with the performance of Kansas basketball over the last few decades.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:13 amMaybe it is a shitty needle. But when you've been the most dominant program for the last 4ish decades and have only 1 natty to show for it, that just isn't going to feel completely satisfying.
It's time to win the big 1.
Getting to a bunch of AFC title games won't make Mahomes a GOAT. Winning super bowls will.
It does not guarantee a #1 or #2 seed. We were a #4 seed in 2006 and a #3 seed in 2009, and would have been a #3 seed in 2014 if the committee knew Embiid wasn't going to play.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:22 amCan someone describe this mythical scenario where trying to win the Big 12 title comes "at the expense of" KU being in a better position to win a national title? I hear this argument all the time but no one can provide a logical example of what that would ever be. It's usually just assumptions that someone younger didn't get enough minutes and "would have been the difference if he was allowed to develop in Big 12 play with more minutes" which is pure assumption that is rarely likely to have actually been realistic.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:10 amI only really cared about the Big 12 title when matching and setting the all-time record. All other years, great if we get it, but not at the expense of getting the team in the best position for the NCAA tournament where all teams' success is ultimately judged.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:53 am
Sure. All true. I just mean a big 12 title absent of a natty doesn't move the needle for me any more now that the streak has ended.
The joy of winning a conference championship dissipates in a matter of days at Kansas Basketball.
Winning the Big 12, especially as good as it is, guarantees a #1 or #2 seed. What more do you want to ensure that KU has the best possible chance to succeed in the tourney besides the highest possible seed? There is zero guarantee that some random bench player would develop into the difference maker on the biggest stage thanks to some extra minutes in Big 12 play. History has shown that getting the best possible seed is the best way to increase your odds of tourney success and there is loads of data to support that.
That's silly. Three other Big 12 teams have made the Final Four in the last 5 tourneys.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:25 am We should win the big 12 every single year.
We have no peer in the big 12.
That doesn't make them our peer.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:27 amThat's silly. Three other Big 12 teams have made the Final Four in the last 5 tourneys.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:25 am We should win the big 12 every single year.
We have no peer in the big 12.
We should contend for the Big 12 every year and win it most years.
You said the needle is not moved unless KU wins a title.
2006: We tied with Texas, who got a #2 seed. The team right behind us got a #12 seed. I'd rather be a #4 seed than a #12 seed.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:26 amIt does not guarantee a #1 or #2 seed. We were a #4 seed in 2006 and a #3 seed in 2009, and would have been a #3 seed in 2014 if the committee knew Embiid wasn't going to play.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:22 amCan someone describe this mythical scenario where trying to win the Big 12 title comes "at the expense of" KU being in a better position to win a national title? I hear this argument all the time but no one can provide a logical example of what that would ever be. It's usually just assumptions that someone younger didn't get enough minutes and "would have been the difference if he was allowed to develop in Big 12 play with more minutes" which is pure assumption that is rarely likely to have actually been realistic.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:10 am
I only really cared about the Big 12 title when matching and setting the all-time record. All other years, great if we get it, but not at the expense of getting the team in the best position for the NCAA tournament where all teams' success is ultimately judged.
The joy of winning a conference championship dissipates in a matter of days at Kansas Basketball.
Winning the Big 12, especially as good as it is, guarantees a #1 or #2 seed. What more do you want to ensure that KU has the best possible chance to succeed in the tourney besides the highest possible seed? There is zero guarantee that some random bench player would develop into the difference maker on the biggest stage thanks to some extra minutes in Big 12 play. History has shown that getting the best possible seed is the best way to increase your odds of tourney success and there is loads of data to support that.
I would like to win everything available to us, but a bad regular season can be completely cured. A conference title, for me, does not take the sting away of losing to UNI, VCU, Villanova, etc. That is how those teams are remembered and judged.
Oh, god, you aren't going to get hung up on the word "peer" like you did on "rival" are you? That was exhausting.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:28 amThat doesn't make them our peer.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:27 amThat's silly. Three other Big 12 teams have made the Final Four in the last 5 tourneys.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:25 am We should win the big 12 every single year.
We have no peer in the big 12.
We should contend for the Big 12 every year and win it most years.
UK Duke UNC. That's probably it.