Kansas Crimson

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:37 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:27 am

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 7:31 am ask Ukraine about trusting musk

If we get through the Trump madness, we're going to have an even thornier problem to sort there. And honestly we don't have all THAT much time to keep sorting these human problems.

i couldn’t agree more

gov’t-subsidized leverage in the hands of someone with questionable morals and ethics? hard pass

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:44 am take your meds

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:42 am dt is a horrible man. horrible. and the demonrats run against him, the only person in their party that the horrible man can hang with. anybody else would be running circles around the horrible man.

not taking the time when old uncle retired. may end up the biggest blunder in US politics history.

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 9:26 am

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:44 am take your meds

Hate to say it but I may need to take my meds too. After 11/5 I might not disagree with what MICH posted.

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 9:34 am

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:42 am dt is a horrible man. horrible. and the demonrats run against him, the only person in their party that the horrible man can hang with. anybody else would be running circles around the horrible man.

not taking the time when old uncle retired. may end up the biggest blunder in US politics history.

The biggest blunder in US political history is more likely to be the GOP choosing to stick with Trump when they could have buried him after either of his two impeachments and moved on.

I will never forget what MAGA traitors have done to this great nation and I doubt I am alone in that.

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:21 am Well if the democrats wanted to run a decent candidate, they'd have to actually hold a primary. But they don't beleive in democracy anymore. Instead they just try to appoint the next puppet of the military industrial machine

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:21 am Well if the democrats wanted to run a decent candidate, they'd have to actually hold a primary. But they don't beleive in democracy anymore. Instead they just try to appoint the next puppet of the military industrial machine

DrPepper wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 11:11 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:21 am Well if the democrats wanted to run a decent candidate, they'd have to actually hold a primary. But they don't beleive in democracy anymore. Instead they just try to appoint the next puppet of the military industrial machine

Randy, why do you keep saying this? My state held a primary. I voted in it. Those votes equaled delegates that vote for the candidate the party puts forward for the general election. That is how it works in a state with a primary. Some states have caucuses.
A couple of states did not have primaries because there was no one else competing. For example, when Nikki Haley dropped out of the race, Delaware did not hold a Republican presidential primary and gave all the delegates to Trump.
This (no primary for President), is not uncommon when a sitting President is in the race. For instance, Florida did not hold a Democratic Primary when Clinton and Obama were running for their second terms as President. Florida did not hold a Primary this year because, at the time, Biden was running for a second term.
Randy, turn off your radio and do your own research. You do not have to be a sheep.

DrPepper wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 11:11 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:21 am Well if the democrats wanted to run a decent candidate, they'd have to actually hold a primary. But they don't beleive in democracy anymore. Instead they just try to appoint the next puppet of the military industrial machine

Randy, why do you keep saying this? My state held a primary. I voted in it. Those votes equaled delegates that vote for the candidate the party puts forward for the general election. That is how it works in a state with a primary. Some states have caucuses.
A couple of states did not have primaries because there was no one else competing. For example, when Nikki Haley dropped out of the race, Delaware did not hold a Republican presidential primary and gave all the delegates to Trump.
This (no primary for President), is not uncommon when a sitting President is in the race. For instance, Florida did not hold a Democratic Primary when Clinton and Obama were running for their second terms as President. Florida did not hold a Primary this year because, at the time, Biden was running for a second term.
Randy, turn off your radio and do your own research. You do not have to be a sheep.

defixione wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:52 pm I would surmise that most Democrats are okay with Kamala to represent them as the D candidate for president. What I don't understand is why you are in such a rage about how she was selected. You would never vote for a Dem so why the hissy fit? If she is as stupid as you and psych contend, she doesn't have a chance in this election which should make the both of you happy.

defixione wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:52 pm I would surmise that most Democrats are okay with Kamala to represent them as the D candidate for president. What I don't understand is why you are in such a rage about how she was selected. You would never vote for a Dem so why the hissy fit? If she is as stupid as you and psych contend, she doesn't have a chance in this election which should make the both of you happy.

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 9:22 am I was thinking, if we find ourselves in a similar situation in this upcoming election that we had in 2020, would Harris be the one to certify the vote?

It seems that would be, or appear to be, a conflict of interest.

On the other hand, would that duty then fall on Mike Johnson, who very few would say would be trustworthy to carry out that duty?