Kansas Crimson

https://www.dailywire.com/news/37198/uh ... ly-zanotti

HA!

I clicked the link and got one of those “you’ve won an amazon gift card” scam windows on my phone.
Can you find something more reputable? TIA

No, he can't.

DrPepper wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:37 pm I clicked the link and got one of those “you’ve won an amazon gift card” scam windows on my phone.
Can you find something more reputable? TIA

Well, normally Count is looking to get board members banned. Maybe this is his way of reaching out and getting people gift cards?

I applaud the effort.

DrPepper wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:37 pm I clicked the link and got one of those “you’ve won an amazon gift card” scam windows on my phone.
Can you find something more reputable? TIA

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 668745002/

Good enough for you?

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:32 am

DrPepper wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:37 pm I clicked the link and got one of those “you’ve won an amazon gift card” scam windows on my phone.
Can you find something more reputable? TIA

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 668745002/

Good enough for you?

It has to be CNN or New York Times. Otherwise, it is unacceptable.

What did she lie about?

The comparison of the article titles tells you everything you need to know.

DrPepper wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:01 am The comparison of the article titles tells you everything you need to know.

You said you were getting an ad when you clicked. So you're just lying like she is.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:47 am What did she lie about?

Not being corrupt, perhaps?

Also padding the death rate by 100x.

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:12 am

DrPepper wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:01 am The comparison of the article titles tells you everything you need to know.

You said you were getting an ad when you clicked. So you're just lying like she is.

Nice try. You can read the title before the add came up. Try it yourself.
While you are there, note that one source’s title insinuates direct connection as if it is her vary office that is being raided. Then read your second source which explains that the mayor is cooperating and that the office that was raided is in another building. The mayor may be guilty. But I like my sources to stick to the facts.

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:16 am Also padding the death rate by 100x.

Proof?

DrPepper wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:23 am

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:12 am

DrPepper wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:01 am The comparison of the article titles tells you everything you need to know.

You said you were getting an ad when you clicked. So you're just lying like she is.

Nice try. You can read the title before the add came up. Try it yourself.
While you are there, note that one source’s title insinuates direct connection as if it is her vary office that is being raided. Then read your second source which explains that the mayor is cooperating and that the office that was raided is in another building. The mayor may be guilty. But I like my sources to stick to the facts.

I get the article with no issue. You might have a virus.

It is possible that all three of the following may be true at the same time: A. She and/or the municipal government of San Juan is corrupt; B. Her conflict with Trump has nothing to do with the investigation; and C. Hurricane relief was less than ideal

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:16 am Also padding the death rate by 100x.

The Mayor did that? I thought it was researchers from George Washington U that came up with a revised death rate.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:13 pm It is possible that all three of the following may be true at the same time: A. She and/or the municipal government of San Juan is corrupt; B. Her conflict with Trump has nothing to do with the investigation; and C. Hurricane relief was less than ideal

Oh, you're no fun anymore.

seahawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:55 pm

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:16 am Also padding the death rate by 100x.

The Mayor did that? I thought it was researchers from George Washington U that came up with a revised death rate.

Using numbers the mayor fed to them.

Have we spoken about the numbers? How many is Trump saying died, like a dozen and he thinks he saw each one of them personally on his visit? Our society can not live months without electricity. The heat will kill the old and the fat. All the people on dialysis can’t survive without electricity. Doesn’t insulin need refrigerated and have a short shelf life? These are just some things that come to mind and I don’t know the validity of these theories. If trump is claiming that the only victims are those dead during the actual storm, I don’t think that is a useful number and very disingenuous.

imzcount wrote: ↑Fri Oct 19, 2018 12:25 pm

seahawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:55 pm

imzcount wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:16 am Also padding the death rate by 100x.

The Mayor did that? I thought it was researchers from George Washington U that came up with a revised death rate.

Using numbers the mayor fed to them.

The research was actually requested by the Governor of Puerto Rico, who isn't an ally of the mayor. The study was done by researchers from GWU and the University of Puerto Rico and used death certificates.

Are you accusing the mayor of making up false death certificates across the island? Because that seems a little tin foil hat-ish.