Kansas Crimson

selfie? So who is the photograph of, Trump or Hillary? How low can this investigation go anyway?

Leave it to the National Enquirer, I mean CNN, to put this out as hot news.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/28/politics ... index.html

On a side note, convicted sex offender Anthony Weiner is due to be released from his cushy prison next May. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... enter.html

Rajaratnam, a major political donor to Hillary Clinton, has been living it up at Devens with a prime top-floor cell, a private bathroom, an in-room T.V., and a personal 'manservant'

Do you know that the guy you most support is known to the Federal Judiciary as “Individual 1”?

A pic of Trumps goofy looking little cock?

Priceless.

Never seen so many men obsessed with commenting on the size of another man's penis. Weird....especially when it's old guys like Plano who probably aren't even sexually active anymore.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:34 am Never seen so many men obsessed with commenting on the size of another man's penis. Weird....especially when it's old guys like Plano who probably aren't even sexually active anymore.

Lol

So I caught an episode of “The 90s” last night that covered the Ken Starr investigation and Clinton impeachment.

Starr basically dug every which angle on Clinton til he found whatever dirt he could. Dude was testifying about real estate when he was randomly asked, btw did you ever get a beej in the Oval Office?”

Clinton was impeached, but ultimately acquitted, with the sentiment being that even if he did lie under oath, it was not grave enough to be considered a fundamental attack on the constitutional values of the republic.

So how does that special council compare and contrast with Mueller and Trump? While Starr was much more vocal about the investigation, Mueller has held his hand close.

And also what about that whole attack on constitutional values thing?

False

dolomite wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 8:58 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:34 am Never seen so many men obsessed with commenting on the size of another man's penis. Weird....especially when it's old guys like Plano who probably aren't even sexually active anymore.

Lol

Interesting that as soon as cock is mentioned, you 2 dumbasses chime in quick.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:57 amFalse

Good commentary!

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 2:04 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:57 amFalse

Good commentary!

Solid source!

FaKeNeWs!


(DC wuz so much more fun before he became a Trumpalo)

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 3:07 pm FaKeNeWs!

Yes.

For the record, the biggest falsehood in your story is that it ignores the fact that the Independent Counsel Statute mandated the Attorney General approve any expansion of mandate. Which is to say that Janet Reno approved everything before Starr even thought about investigating.

There are many more, but I ain't your encyclopedia.

All this proves is that Janet Reno didn’t participate in obstruction of justice, unlike the Trumpistas and whoever passes for a Republican these days. It does not disprove that Starr was a flaming partisan.

That he* could doesn’t require that he should.

*he = Starr

You know that Mueller isn't subject to the Independent Counsel Statute, right? It expired in 1999 and was replaced by the Office of Special Counsel, which is a different beast.

But you carry on pretending.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 3:13 pm For the record, the biggest falsehood in your story is that it ignores the fact that the Independent Counsel Statute mandated the Attorney General approve any expansion of mandate. Which is to say that Janet Reno approved everything before Starr even thought about investigating.

There are many more, but I ain't your encyclopedia.

You ain’t?

Dangit, there goes my solid source.

but for real, thanks for the sincere insight.

the tone of the CNN doc def had a slant to it. I shoulda said something sooner.

Except the one part about the “btw did you get a beej” question was the take of my father. He’s a card-carrying, Fox News watching, Trump condoning conservative to the core, yet even he of all people has always said the whole Clinton impeachment was a big witch hunt.

Shrug.

I remember 90s adolescent goody goody naive Catholic ousdahl thought Clinton was a sleazeball who got what he deserved, and that any other man in a powerful and respectable position would never foster an illicit affair, lulz

The other thing is that it wasn't about a blowjob, anymore than Trump's troubles are about his "private life" with an old friend who just happens to be a porn star/stripper.

Clinton had friends clear her out of Washington, specifically to hide her from the IC and to keep her quiet. He tasked his golf buddy/fixer Vernon Jordan with finding her a job in New York and pressured then-U.N.-Ambassador Bill Richardson to hire her in his office at the UN. (Richardson offered, but Lewinsky declined).

Moreover, Clinton lied twice under oath, the first time in the Paula Jones suit (which was the basis for the expansion of Starr's investigation) and again when question by the OIC (is, is).

FTR, Trump’s “troubles” are too numerous and varied, and not just confined to porn stars. They likely include, among other things, money laundering on behalf of criminals from an enemy State.

getting back to the compare/contrast, how much dirt did Starr manage to dig up? at what rate?

meanwhile, Mueller has already uncovered how many indictments, convictions, guilty pleas, etc. and he's not even finished...