Kansas Crimson

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 11:03 pm And? It doesn't need to be there, it serves no purpose in the proceedings, so take it out.

"Do you solemnly swear or affirm, under penalty of law, that the testimony that you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?" seems to most accurately reflect the situation. What's God helping a person do, tell the truth? You obviously haven't been watching the train of Trump cronies testify.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 11:05 pm Church...........................State

dolomite wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:23 am The draft rules also remove the phrase "his or her" throughout the document, changing those two pronouns to "their." The rules additionally modify all references to the committee's "Chairman" to instead refer only to the committee's "Chair."

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 9:00 am

dolomite wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:23 am The draft rules also remove the phrase "his or her" throughout the document, changing those two pronouns to "their." The rules additionally modify all references to the committee's "Chairman" to instead refer only to the committee's "Chair."

I personally think it's stupid that someone would be offended by "his/her" or words like "chairman" or postman...but I'm fine with changing some of that stuff to compromise with people who are offended....but at a certain point I do wonder where will it end?

twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 9:53 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 9:00 am

dolomite wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:23 am The draft rules also remove the phrase "his or her" throughout the document, changing those two pronouns to "their." The rules additionally modify all references to the committee's "Chairman" to instead refer only to the committee's "Chair."

I personally think it's stupid that someone would be offended by "his/her" or words like "chairman" or postman...but I'm fine with changing some of that stuff to compromise with people who are offended....but at a certain point I do wonder where will it end?

Adjusting to the social and political environment and citizens of your nation never ends because the profile of the social and political environment and citizens of the nation continually changes. Just treat things like these as course adjustments in a never ending journey.

dolomite wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:46 am Wow, the Donald really has you distressed. You might want to check your bp, no sense stroking out over someone who you don't even have a personal relationship with.

p.s. I'm sorry that you don't believe in God.

twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:35 pm

dolomite wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:46 am Wow, the Donald really has you distressed. You might want to check your bp, no sense stroking out over someone who you don't even have a personal relationship with.

p.s. I'm sorry that you don't believe in God.

I'm not. Nothing has led to more murder, mayhem and death than fighting in support of one's religion. It's hard to believe in a God that would "put Donald Trump in the White House".

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/30/politics ... index.html

"I think God calls all of us to fill different roles at different times and I think that he wanted Donald Trump to become president, and that's why he's there," Sanders told CBN's David Brody and Jennifer Wishon, according to a transcript of the interview provided by CBN.

Mind boggling. When you're willing to believe that God put a man who has cheated on multiple wives and who treats people like garbage into the White House just because he he is an R and supports your policy platforms then something is seriously wrong with your belief structure and moral compass. If there really is a God and he WANTED this scum bag to be our nation's leader then a religion with that God at the top is not one I would ever choose to participate in.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 5:54 am I have reviewed the evidence and data I have available to me and I am comfortable with my opinion of the situation. Thanks!