Kansas Crimson

Gutter wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:36 am Spike owned Donald last night. Got a reaction from the commander in chief.

DrPepper wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:57 pm

Gutter wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:36 am Spike owned Donald last night. Got a reaction from the commander in chief.

Spike doesn’t mention Trump by name, yet Trump assumes the term “hate” was referencing him.

dolomite wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:45 pm

DrPepper wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:57 pm

Gutter wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:36 am Spike owned Donald last night. Got a reaction from the commander in chief.

Spike doesn’t mention Trump by name, yet Trump assumes the term “hate” was referencing him.

Do people really know what Trump means when he speaks? I believe a lot of his sentences are taken out of context and the meanings are twisted around to fit the liberal narrative. For example the media has had a hay day when he said SOME of the undocumented immigrants are rapists. Note he did not say ALL are rapists. The media would like people to believe that it was “ALL”. One of Hitler’s buddies said if you tell a lie enough times people will start believing it. As far as the “nice people on both sides”, who knows what he was thinking? Just another example of the media trying to make up excuses or reasons to hate Trump. The statement that “Mexico will pay for the wall” is another example which can be taken two different ways. No one actually believes that Mexico will write a check, it would be indirect payments via more favorable trade deals.
I know the people that hate Trump will keep on hating him and the same could be said for Obama, the hating that is.

Gutter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 6:41 am

dolomite wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:45 pm

DrPepper wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:57 pm
Spike doesn’t mention Trump by name, yet Trump assumes the term “hate” was referencing him.

Do people really know what Trump means when he speaks? I believe a lot of his sentences are taken out of context and the meanings are twisted around to fit the liberal narrative. For example the media has had a hay day when he said SOME of the undocumented immigrants are rapists. Note he did not say ALL are rapists. The media would like people to believe that it was “ALL”. One of Hitler’s buddies said if you tell a lie enough times people will start believing it. As far as the “nice people on both sides”, who knows what he was thinking? Just another example of the media trying to make up excuses or reasons to hate Trump. The statement that “Mexico will pay for the wall” is another example which can be taken two different ways. No one actually believes that Mexico will write a check, it would be indirect payments via more favorable trade deals.
I know the people that hate Trump will keep on hating him and the same could be said for Obama, the hating that is.

I'll bite and respond.
Does Trump really know what he means when he speaks? I'll answer that for you. Too often - no.
I believe a lot of his sentences are taken out of context because no one knows what the fuck he means and/or is saying. Including himself. If that fits the "liberal narrative" what it the "conservative narrative"? To not know what the fuck you're talking about?
The media should have a field day when a man running for President says about Mexico and Mexican people - “They are not our friend, believe me.” "When will the U.S. stop sending $'s to our enemies, i.e. Mexico and others". "I want nothing to do with Mexico other than to build an impenetrable WALL and stop them from ripping off U.S.". "“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best, they’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” “Mexico is going to pay for the wall.
As far as your quoting Hitler's buddy, you were close with the quote but that's not what's important here. You don't think that quote applies to Trump as much as it does the media?
You said, "As far as the “nice people on both sides”, who knows what he was thinking"? I'm not sure Trump knew what he was thinking but I have to assume there are a lot of well educated and intelligent people who took it to mean Trump felt the racist fucks are good people. Or I'll give him the benefit of doubt and say maybe Trump meant that there were good people there - who can be and are racist.
You said, "No one actually believes that Mexico will write a check, it would be indirect payments via more favorable trade deals". Ok, you get it but to say "no one actually believes Mexico will write a check" shows ignorance and blindness. Of course there are a shit load of people who believed he meant Mexico would pay for the wall. In cash, a check, whatever.
You're 100% right about one thing. Haters are going to be haters. I can't believe some of the shit I see/read/hear on BOTH sides. If some/many people truly believe what they say then they should be institutionalized. I seriously mean it. They are very sick people.

chiknbut wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 9:47 am

Gutter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 6:41 am

dolomite wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:45 pm
Do people really know what Trump means when he speaks? I believe a lot of his sentences are taken out of context and the meanings are twisted around to fit the liberal narrative. For example the media has had a hay day when he said SOME of the undocumented immigrants are rapists. Note he did not say ALL are rapists. The media would like people to believe that it was “ALL”. One of Hitler’s buddies said if you tell a lie enough times people will start believing it. As far as the “nice people on both sides”, who knows what he was thinking? Just another example of the media trying to make up excuses or reasons to hate Trump. The statement that “Mexico will pay for the wall” is another example which can be taken two different ways. No one actually believes that Mexico will write a check, it would be indirect payments via more favorable trade deals.
I know the people that hate Trump will keep on hating him and the same could be said for Obama, the hating that is.

I'll bite and respond.
Does Trump really know what he means when he speaks? I'll answer that for you. Too often - no.
I believe a lot of his sentences are taken out of context because no one knows what the fuck he means and/or is saying. Including himself. If that fits the "liberal narrative" what it the "conservative narrative"? To not know what the fuck you're talking about?
The media should have a field day when a man running for President says about Mexico and Mexican people - “They are not our friend, believe me.” "When will the U.S. stop sending $'s to our enemies, i.e. Mexico and others". "I want nothing to do with Mexico other than to build an impenetrable WALL and stop them from ripping off U.S.". "“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best, they’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” “Mexico is going to pay for the wall.
As far as your quoting Hitler's buddy, you were close with the quote but that's not what's important here. You don't think that quote applies to Trump as much as it does the media?
You said, "As far as the “nice people on both sides”, who knows what he was thinking"? I'm not sure Trump knew what he was thinking but I have to assume there are a lot of well educated and intelligent people who took it to mean Trump felt the racist fucks are good people. Or I'll give him the benefit of doubt and say maybe Trump meant that there were good people there - who can be and are racist.
You said, "No one actually believes that Mexico will write a check, it would be indirect payments via more favorable trade deals". Ok, you get it but to say "no one actually believes Mexico will write a check" shows ignorance and blindness. Of course there are a shit load of people who believed he meant Mexico would pay for the wall. In cash, a check, whatever.
You're 100% right about one thing. Haters are going to be haters. I can't believe some of the shit I see/read/hear on BOTH sides. If some/many people truly believe what they say then they should be institutionalized. I seriously mean it. They are very sick people.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much effort for Doltomite, Gutman.