21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:41 am
?
As it stands today...
Harris
Braun
Agbaji
Wilson
McCormack
Needs to be:
Transfer PG
Transfer SG
Agbaji
Wilson
McCormack
Page 1 of 169
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:50 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:52 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:54 am
We'll just go and grab 2 Top 10 NBA draft prospects, no big deal.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:57 am
So we have 3 PF's coming in (all 6'7-6'8), Clemence, Adams who have signed and another guy not signed yet? But no Center nor a PG or SG? Should be a great year 
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:57 am
Thank you.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:54 am We'll just go and grab 2 Top 10 NBA draft prospects, no big deal.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:00 am
We have a 6’8 260 lb juco PF/C coming in.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:02 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:02 am
I think Self realized this team is undersized and he needed a stretch 4 rather than a 4th guard, and that's Clemence. I think the other two are just the next best two bigs he could get.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:05 am
How many scholarships do we have yet, assuming no one transfers and we only lose Garrett?
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:09 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:16 am
I'm not sure what choice we have other than adding someone like Marcus Carr and hoping like hell Och and Wilson take significant jumps. CB/TGF/Enaruna/Harris or TyTy could round out a nice rotation, and we try and run it back with this group.
Our frontcourt depth will be better.
Our frontcourt depth will be better.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:16 am
Current 21-22 roster:
1 Agbaji SR
2 Grant-Foster SR &
3 McCormack SR
4 Braun JR
5 Curry JR
6 Enaruna JR &
7 Harris SO
8 Jossell SO &
9 Muscadin SO $
10 Thompson SO
11 Wilson SO
12 Adams FR
13 Clemence FR
14 Lightfoot SR *
15 Teahan SR *
16 Jankovich JR %
13 scholarships allowed.
“Free” eligibility year not counted.
* = Covid exempt to scholarship total
% = walk-on
$ = Redshirt candidate
& = transfer candidate
I think I have this correct now?
1 Agbaji SR
2 Grant-Foster SR &
3 McCormack SR
4 Braun JR
5 Curry JR
6 Enaruna JR &
7 Harris SO
8 Jossell SO &
9 Muscadin SO $
10 Thompson SO
11 Wilson SO
12 Adams FR
13 Clemence FR
14 Lightfoot SR *
15 Teahan SR *
16 Jankovich JR %
13 scholarships allowed.
“Free” eligibility year not counted.
* = Covid exempt to scholarship total
% = walk-on
$ = Redshirt candidate
& = transfer candidate
I think I have this correct now?
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:21 am
Teahan is a walk on, so no threat that he will count against.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:22 am
Thank you.sdoyel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:16 am Current 21-22 roster:
1 Agbaji SR
2 Grant-Foster SR &
3 McCormack SR
4 Braun JR
5 Curry JR
6 Enaruna JR &
7 Harris SO
8 Jossell SO &
9 Muscadin SO $
10 Thompson SO
11 Wilson SO
12 Adams FR
13 Clemence FR
14 Lightfoot SR *
15 Teahan SR *
16 Jankovich JR %
13 scholarships allowed.
“Free” eligibility year not counted.
* = Covid exempt to scholarship total
% = walk-on
$ = Redshirt candidate
& = transfer candidate
I think I have this correct now?
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:28 am
It'd be nice to have some idea whether I'll care about next year's results. If we're tournament-eligible, then I'd be very very very concerned about us landing a lead guard transfer.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:16 am I'm not sure what choice we have other than adding someone like Marcus Carr and hoping like hell Och and Wilson take significant jumps. CB/TGF/Enaruna/Harris or TyTy could round out a nice rotation, and we try and run it back with this group.
Our frontcourt depth will be better.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:55 am
How much may it be possible to re-think Dave’s role?
It’s not that he’s not good. It’s that he’s an old school center who wants to play like a finesse forward.
It’s not that he’s not good. It’s that he’s an old school center who wants to play like a finesse forward.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:03 am
I've come around on him. I can see a scenario where we're very good and he leads us in scoring. That said, we have a low ceiling if we can't find one backcourt guy, or preferably two, who can go get a goddamned bucket.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:04 am
Thinking about Dave’s game, doesn’t it seem like the ball stops with him a lot?
If he gets it in the post, he’s gonna collect and assess, which give the d time to square up and maybe even double.
Contrast that with Dok, who would often pin the D and be making a move to the hoop before he even caught the ball, and often score in rhythm, within a second or less of being fed.
Now I know Dok is physically superior to Dave, but I think it’s also very much a footwork thing, and I dunno what’s preventing Dave from improving that.
If he gets it in the post, he’s gonna collect and assess, which give the d time to square up and maybe even double.
Contrast that with Dok, who would often pin the D and be making a move to the hoop before he even caught the ball, and often score in rhythm, within a second or less of being fed.
Now I know Dok is physically superior to Dave, but I think it’s also very much a footwork thing, and I dunno what’s preventing Dave from improving that.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:06 am
Doke was a black hole, until he wasn't. And then he was the best big in the country.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:04 am Thinking about Dave’s game, doesn’t it seem like the ball stops with him a lot?
If he gets it in the post, he’s gonna collect and assess, which give the d time to square up and maybe even double.
Contrast that with Dok, who would often pin the D and be making a move to the hoop before he even caught the ball, and often score in rhythm, within a second or less of being fed.
Now I know Dok is physically superior to Dave, but I think it’s also very much a footwork thing, and I dunno what’s preventing Dave from improving that.