B12 2024
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:08 pm
Non con close to over.
KU finishes 12-1.
Houston WVU and KU TCU open B12 next Saturday.
KU finishes 12-1.
Houston WVU and KU TCU open B12 next Saturday.
Yep. Just 1 of our first 8 conference games are against a ranked team and that's an Oklahoma team who I question just how good they really are. Then we end with 7 of our last 10 against ranked teams.
Good point, tho with how prone we can be to play down to our competition, we may find ourselves in another January dogfight struggling to break 60 against some sub-500 conference bottom feeder
No kidding. We've been held under 70 just 3 times all season; by UConn, Tennessee and Marquette and we still won 2 of those. The best team defenses in the Big 12 this year seem to be Houston, BYU, Iowa State and Oklahoma. Houston hasn't played a single decent team all year. Iowa State has only played 2 decent teams so far and both hung 70+ on them and beat them. Oklahoma's played 1 decent team all year and that team hung 80+ on them and beat them.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:43 am We are 12-1 with our lone loss to a very good Marquette team. We seem to be doing just fine.
He's just trying too hard to be negative and creating false "eye test" narratives that aren't supported by stats. So, basically par for the Ousdahl course around here.
I guess you can call their performance in some of those games as "playing down to their opponent" if you don't put much thought into it. I just see it more as "not playing well for periods of the game and having too many unforced errors even though the opponent is inferior". I didn't feel like it was because the opponent was inferior. They just make too many unforced errors. They've been guilty of the same thing against good teams, too. They could have blown the doors off UConn and UK if they didn't shoot themselves in the foot with a bunch of unforced errors at both ends.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:54 amHe's just trying too hard to be negative and creating false "eye test" narratives that aren't supported by stats. So, basically par for the Ousdahl course around here.
We also aren't a team of good shooters. Some games shots don't go in. Thankfully our team is built to win close grind it out games. That's a positive, not a negative imo.twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 12:05 pmI guess you can call their performance in some of those games as "playing down to their opponent" if you don't put much thought into it. I just see it more as "not playing well for periods of the game and having too many unforced errors even though the opponent is inferior". I didn't feel like it was because the opponent was inferior. They just make too many unforced errors. They've been guilty of the same thing against good teams, too. They could have blown the doors off UConn and UK if they didn't shoot themselves in the foot with a bunch of unforced errors at both ends.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:54 amHe's just trying too hard to be negative and creating false "eye test" narratives that aren't supported by stats. So, basically par for the Ousdahl course around here.
Agreed. McCullar seems to have a good feel for when it's time to shot chucking it and start driving to the rim to draw fouls. And they also seem to have the ability to turn on a lockdown defense when needed. KJ has a good feel for when to ramp up the intensity level and drive his teammates to get after it more on defense.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 12:15 pmWe also aren't a team of good shooters. Some games shots don't go in. Thankfully our team is built to win close grind it out games. That's a positive, not a negative imo.twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 12:05 pmI guess you can call their performance in some of those games as "playing down to their opponent" if you don't put much thought into it. I just see it more as "not playing well for periods of the game and having too many unforced errors even though the opponent is inferior". I didn't feel like it was because the opponent was inferior. They just make too many unforced errors. They've been guilty of the same thing against good teams, too. They could have blown the doors off UConn and UK if they didn't shoot themselves in the foot with a bunch of unforced errors at both ends.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:54 am
He's just trying too hard to be negative and creating false "eye test" narratives that aren't supported by stats. So, basically par for the Ousdahl course around here.