Page 107 of 111
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 4:51 pm
by japhy
you Nazi piece of shit!
Sounds like the Hunter Biden court hearings are getting spicy.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 4:53 pm
by TDub
japhy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 4:51 pm
you Nazi piece of shit!
Sounds like the Hunter Biden court hearings are getting spicy.
oh, I thought you were just quoting Qusdahl and I was wondering what I did this time....
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 5:27 pm
by zsn
I am happy to have Schiff do his thing in the House, and soon, in the Senate, and keep doing it for a long time. Becoming President would diminish his power to hold the hacks accountable.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 6:22 pm
by jfish26
He'd make a great President, if and when the party gets over its need to unilaterally defang itself out of a misplaced expectation of even good faith from the other side.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 6:45 pm
by Sparko
jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 6:22 pm
He'd make a great President, if and when the party gets over its need to unilaterally defang itself out of a misplaced expectation of even good faith from the other side.
Violate a norm?
Re: Charges
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 8:00 pm
by Shirley
According to Phil Bump of the WaPo, a Survey Monkey poll shows that 1/3rd of independents haven't heard the Trump election fraud (hush money) trial verdict.
smh
Re: Charges
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 8:44 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
Shirley wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 8:00 pm
According to Phil Bump of the WaPo, a Survey Monkey poll shows that 1/3rd of independents haven't heard the Trump election fraud (hush money) trial verdict.
smh
1/3 of Independent voters probably have a better life than I do because they don't know about the verdict. I'm confident more often than not, ignorance is (or at last can be) bliss.
Re: Charges
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 10:20 pm
by Sparko
Bliss ends at the concentration camp. Information is golden.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am
by KUTradition
some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:27 am
by jfish26
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am
some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
I genuinely don't know how we recover from this brain rot.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:29 am
by DeletedUser
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am
some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Yikes.
Was it possibly/partially politically motivated? Sure. Almost everything seems to be in one way or another nowadays. But orchestrated? Come on.
And it's not like he didn't actually do most of/all of what they're accusing him of doing.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:34 am
by jfish26
DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:29 am
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am
some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Yikes.
Was it possibly/partially politically motivated? Sure. Almost everything seems to be in one way or another nowadays. But orchestrated? Come on.
And it's not like he didn't actually do most of/all of what they're accusing him of doing.
The histrionics over selective prosecution/bias are profoundly silly. Particularly in light of, you know, everything we're learning about at least two of the sitting R justices, and in light of Hunter Biden being subject to a fair trial as we speak, and in light of Trump's express
promises to vindictively and selectively prosecute - with or without evidence.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:59 am
by DeletedUser
jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:34 am
DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:29 am
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am
some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Yikes.
Was it possibly/partially politically motivated? Sure. Almost everything seems to be in one way or another nowadays. But orchestrated? Come on.
And it's not like he didn't actually do most of/all of what they're accusing him of doing.
The histrionics over selective prosecution/bias are profoundly silly. Particularly in light of, you know, everything we're learning about at least two of the sitting R justices, and in light of Hunter Biden being subject to a fair trial as we speak, and in light of Trump's express
promises to vindictively and selectively prosecute - with or without evidence.
I'm with you.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 6:20 pm
by ousdahl
Hush money sentencing delayed from July 11 til at least September
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:05 pm
by Sparko
Trump is all over the Epstein documents. Many "massages"
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:08 pm
by defixione
Too bad those can't be 'leaked.'
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:13 pm
by Sparko
defixione wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:08 pm
Too bad those can't be 'leaked.'
First dump was today
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:20 pm
by jfish26
There’s gonna be a fairly-YOLO emptying of the books over the next few months. All bets are off.
Re: Charges
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:34 pm
by Overlander
And, it won’t matter.
Not one single bit
Re: Charges
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 7:24 am
by KUTradition
MSNBC:
There was very bad news for Donald Trump in Monday’s Supreme Court decision, and arguably even worse news for candidate Trump. That’s because Mike Pence is going to walk into a federal courtroom, raise his right hand, take an oath to tell the truth, and testify against Trump in this case in September for an evidentiary hearing.
What Monday’s decision did was give Trump absolute immunity applying to one paragraph of the indictment. The rest of the indictment goes back to Judge Tanya Chutkan’s courtroom, where the Supreme Court has ordered her to have a hearing about the evidence in the case to determine whether Trump’s actions were “official acts,” meaning they may be protected by immunity, or not. That goes for everything in the case, except for one conversation that Trump had with the acting attorney general...