21-22 lineup

Kansas Basketball.
NDballer13
Posts: 1734
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by NDballer13 »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 3:11 pm and last year we had the biggest lineup 1-5 we’ve ever fielded, and weren’t exactly a defensive juggernaut
12 adjD.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

Oh, go figure.

Yeah, covid threw a wrench in those gears.

And still, it’s just hard remembering that 21 team as some defensive beast, considering they got blown the fuck out more times than any other season I can remember.

Good defensive teams don’t loose by 34 in the second round. Nomesayin.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Again, pre-COVID.
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by Mjl »

hasbeen wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 1:43 pm Really don't understand the concern about the size of our 2 guard. If they're creative around the rim it doesn't matter. Braun is big and not creative around the rim. I'd much prefer the former.

No clue if Yes is creative around the rim, just saying if he is then that's far, far more important than him being a few inches taller.
He's got a really sweet floater - it's kinda his signature shot. Several of them here:

User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

If you’re gonna offer that as an excuse then you can’t rip on Jalen for not finishing the season stronger too.

But still, a good defensive team has the depth to still be competitive even with a guy or two out sick.

And even then, a tournament narrative almost as big as covid was, we’re gonna try to get TGIF more minutes cuz we need more athleticism out there.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:01 pm If you’re gonna offer that as an excuse then you can’t rip on Jalen for not finishing the season stronger too.

But still, a good defensive team has the depth to still be competitive even with a guy or two out sick.
That post was not meant to rip Jalen, but rather to point out that we're all guilty of cherry picking which players were responsible for last season. But Jalen hit the wall way before getting COVID.

I don't agree with your second sentence. Losing your starting frontcourt is a huge deal for defense no matter how good their backups are. Last year's defense, at its peak, was elite and they played that way until MICH's fungus set in.
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by Mjl »

Yep. At the start of last season there wasn't much difference between Mitch and Dave defensively. By end of season there was a huge difference. Dave improved immensely at that end, whereas Mitch still fucks up regularly.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

I guess.

Yeah, I suppose any team not named 2008 takes a huge step back without their starting bigs.

And yeah, maybe last year actually ended up pretty good defensively.

We got blown out by Texas, and Tennessee too, earlier in the season, but did seem to eventually dial it in.

If there’s a bigger gripe, it’s that the team struggled to score. Heck, 4 different conference games we couldn’t even get to 60. Not even on k state in February!
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

No question that last year's Achilles heel was scoring.

And, it probably will be this year, too.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

Mjl wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:12 pm Yep. At the start of last season there wasn't much difference between Mitch and Dave defensively. By end of season there was a huge difference. Dave improved immensely at that end, whereas Mitch still fucks up regularly.
Yea. I think it’s been said, but Mitch was prob recruited more as an old school PF, and was never really meant to be a lone big in a 4-out set.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

In fairness, when we recruited Mitch, the PF was still a thing evidence by Malone and Barkley's dominance at that time.
nu_bronco
Posts: 805
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:46 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by nu_bronco »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:18 pm In fairness, when we recruited Mitch, the PF was still a thing evidence by Malone and Barkley's dominance at that time.
Who played more years? Mitch or Sleeves?
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

And maybe we’ll struggle to score this year, but we also brought in a lot of guys that seem to address just that.

I don’t think Och/Braun/Jalen will all collectively struggle to shoot or finish as much as they did.

We’ve got 3 experienced transfers who scored a combined 46ppg at the D1 level last year. And only one is projected to start.

So that bench already projects a lot better than a true freshman shooting guard who can’t shoot, and a juco wing.
Last edited by ousdahl on Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

nu_bronco wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:24 pm
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:18 pm In fairness, when we recruited Mitch, the PF was still a thing evidence by Malone and Barkley's dominance at that time.
Who played more years? Mitch or Sleeves?
JCL says, “hold my Metamucil and watch this!”
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:25 pm And maybe we’ll struggle to score this year, but we also brought in a lot of guys that seem to address just that.

I don’t think Och/Braun/Jalen will all collectively struggle to shoot or finish as much as they did.

We’ve got 3 experienced transfers who scored a combined 46ppg at the D1 level last year. And only one is projected to start.

So that bench already projects a lot better than a true freshman shooting guard who can’t shoot, and a juco wing.
I think and hope we'll be fine, but consistent scoring would be my bet as to the "weakest" aspect of this team.
Deleted User 89

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by Deleted User 89 »

having a scoring threat at point should do wonders for both Och’s and CB‘s offensive output
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

User avatar
hasbeen
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:59 pm

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by hasbeen »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 3:33 pm I also don't buy that Frank is smaller than Yesufu. Yesufu looks 5'10." Frank was right around there and weighed more. Devonte' much bigger than both those guys and Remy.
Devonte was much bigger but next to never scored using his height. He was a good shooter, elite with both hands, and elite at using his body around the rim.
"So, which one of these topics are conspiracy?

1 .911 was done by Israel: okay, if you think that one is conspiracy, I'll just leave that one alone."

- lobser
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34928
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by pdub »

Remy six foot.
Vonte six foot one.
User avatar
hasbeen
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:59 pm

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by hasbeen »

Why did I think he was 6'3"? He definitely played bigger when inside.
"So, which one of these topics are conspiracy?

1 .911 was done by Israel: okay, if you think that one is conspiracy, I'll just leave that one alone."

- lobser
Post Reply